|| *Comments on the 2005 UAW-Ford 500:* View the most recent comment <#77> | Post a comment <#post> 1. Anonymous posted: 10.03.2005 - 4:11 am Rate this comment: (2) (0) congrats to dale jarret for getting ford into talladega victory lane. 2. HomeDepotKid posted: 10.03.2005 - 4:12 am Rate this comment: (2) (0) THAT was one of the wildest races I've seen in a while. WTG Dale Jarrett! 3. Chicago posted: 10.03.2005 - 4:22 am Rate this comment: (0) (5) This was basically an explanation on why restrictor plate races are a danger that needs to be looked at ... Jimmie Johnson (now having been directly responsible for three bad crashes at Talladega) turns pole-sitter Elliott Sadler going into turn one, sending Sadler sideways and collecting Earnhardt, Jr., right behind them, and Mark Martin. Martin then spins across the track and nails Mike Waltrip in his right rear quarterpanel, who had no where to go, launching him dead right and airborne, barrel rolling twice on the track, almost landing on top of the turn one wall, ripping the entire rear axle out of the car, before he came to rest on the grass next to Mike Skinner's Ford. The only thing that saved Waltrip from injury is that the twenty some cars behind him managed to dodge his Chevrolet. The second major incident of the day; Ryan Newman, showing that he needs to learn how to use his brake pedal or lift off the accelerator, and also needs lessons on how to make more worthwhile excuses, flat out wrecks Casey Mears, who blocks off the entire track and ends up being hit by both Greg Biffle and Rusty Wallace; Rusty gets turned left and into the right rear quarterpanel of Scott Riggs, which sends his car dead right, hitting the trioval wall hard at nearly two hundred miles per hour, the sheer force of the impact sending his car over, onto his roof, then hitting the flat of the trioval before turn one and going end over end over end. Mike Wallace spun through the inside and Jeff Burton, also with damage, ended up having to turn his car hard right to miss being landed on by Riggs. Only luck kept Riggs from serious injury. The only redeeming factor in this race is that a classy guy like Dale Jarrett pulled off a gutsy move on the last lap - the race ended in the middle of turn three after the caution came out for a Kyle Petty spin on the backstretch (why?) to defeat Stewart, and Kenseth (who led at the white). Obviously NASCAR cares more about the money they get from the redneck beer drinking illegible crowd of Alabama residents who go to Talladega to get drunk, see the strippers in the infield, and pray to see thirty some cars end up on the apron in flames, than the safety of the drivers who have made the sport what it is today. The cars are too equal - everyone's afraid to lift, because you'll lose twenty some spots and end up in the "danger zone" for the big crash. So that is what we have now. A recipe for disaster. Talladega was not built for this. Either let the cars go faster and spread them out - cars might get airborne and the licks into the fence might be hard, but you won't have twenty cars trying to dodge an airborne one ... or slow the cars down even further and let them sit in one big pack. The big wrecks will still be there, but they won't be as dangerous and you won't see as many airborne cars. Just my two cents. 4. Thedupontman posted: 10.03.2005 - 10:53 am Rate this comment: (0) (3) When will this season end. the only good thing about today was my NFL Team Won, guess I going to start watching the NFL. 5. STbastien posted: 10.03.2005 - 12:11 pm Rate this comment: (2) (0) congratulation to Dale Jarrett ! :) 6. Mike D posted: 10.03.2005 - 11:25 pm Rate this comment: (2) (0) The only good thing that came out of this race was the win for Jarrett. 7. Jake posted: 10.04.2005 - 3:04 am Rate this comment: (2) (0) Congrats to DJ for winning for the first time in 2 1/2 years. 8. CBCMikeyfan posted: 10.04.2005 - 4:52 am Rate this comment: (3) (0) Riggs' crash reminded me a lot of Earnhardt's wreck in '96, the way he hit the wall and flipped. As for what to do about the plate races, it just seems that the bump drafting is causing all the problems. Maybe, like Benny said yesterday, do away with all the reinforcements on the bumpers and make them put flimsy ones on there, that way if they bump draft, they're essentially done for the day. 9. Brian posted: 10.04.2005 - 2:57 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) That's a nice idea, only thing is I feel bump drafting will still happen and then we'll have 43 cars gone by the end. The only TRUE perfect solution is to get rid of the plates, which would mean flattening the turns. That or get rid of Daytona and Talladega... 10. Eric posted: 10.04.2005 - 8:58 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) After watching tape of the accident that occurred 20 laps into the race, Johnson said he realized he ran into the back of leader Elliott Sadler to start the wreck. Johnson initially claimed he was pushed into Sadler by Dale Earnhardt Jr. "I feel bad, I don't know what else I can say,'' Johnson said. "I started a wreck and took out a lot of good cars. That was the last thing I intended to do and I feel horrible for it. So I'm taking the responsibility. "I needed to see the video to really understand what took place.'' 11. Brian posted: 10.05.2005 - 2:03 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I used to like plate racing. I found it exciting, but the last few years it has become nothing but a wreck fest. I really despise the idea of having a plate race in the final 10 races. I understand they need a little of everything, but it's just too uncontrollable. Again, we have to remove banking. You can't just take the plates off and let them race at 220+ mph. If they do get airborne what if a car was to clear the fence? An unlikely scenario, but if it were to happen...well lets not think about that. 12. Mike D posted: 10.05.2005 - 2:10 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) This race flat out sucked. Congrats to Dale though. I have a soultion to the restrictor plate problem. The cars go too fast? Well that's because they became so aerodynamic. I say at Daytona and Talladega they should use the old 1970's cars! The drag should compensate for the engine power. 13. STbastien posted: 10.05.2005 - 7:41 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) ...A small unrestricted V6 could be the solution. 14. Mike D posted: 10.05.2005 - 10:36 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I've thought about using less powerful engines. But wouldn't having a "maximum" power of the engine or restricting to a certain type be the same as restrictor plates? Every car would be running an identical strength engine...I'd imagien that would keep them bunched up. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, I'm not good with things like that. 15. larry spencer posted: 10.06.2005 - 9:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Good job DJ I think they should take the plates off and let them go 230 16. Jr Fan posted: 10.08.2005 - 12:23 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Dude, would you like to be sitting along the frontstretch at Talladega or Daytona eating a hot dog and drinking your pepsi with your family, suddenly your family gets wiped out along with thousands of other spectators. That would probably be the final NASCAR race too. I like the idea of racing the cars from the 70's also. They are cheaper. Plus that was some of the best racing ever in NASCAR, 1ike the 1976 and 1979 Daytona 500's. Sligshot moves would me the nicest thing to see. Talladega and Daytona created great dules in NASCAR too. 17. Jr Fan posted: 10.08.2005 - 1:36 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) On July 25, 1993 the late Neil Bonnett did the same thing in the trioval as Babby Allison did. Neil WAS using the restrictor plate. 18. Mike D posted: 10.08.2005 - 8:01 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Glad someone liked my 70's idea. Good point with Bonnett, which is way we need smaller engines/less banking/ or 70's cars! Even with plates on the speeds are dangerous. 19. Mike D posted: 10.11.2005 - 8:03 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) Noobs? First, why must you use that horrible destruction of the English language? Second, I AM glad Dale won. Third, this race was sucked. I didn't even find it exciting. What happened to the 40 some lead changes of races past? Oh and I have been watching NASCAR for a long time. So you're calling me a "noob"? I mean look at you, putting down nascar....it's capital letters you know. You n00b 20. Mike D posted: 10.11.2005 - 8:05 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) One more thing to add. There was not one comma or period in your comment. Just saying... 21. Chicago posted: 10.13.2005 - 3:09 am Rate this comment: (0) (1) About ~ 40 lead changes ... remember, the 600 earlier this year had over 40 and that wasn't much of a race. :) If Bobby Allison had gone into the stands in '87, Talladega would've been the largest pasture and parking lot in Alabama and it would've been the end of competitive automobile racing in the United States. Remember, after what happened in Le Mans in '55, Switzerland completely banned auto racing. If eighty or ninety or a hundred spectators - certainly a possibility with the way Allison's car was spiraling toward the catchfence - were killed, would it have been such a stretch to see something like that happen in the United States? Also an excellent point on how Neil Bonnett took an eerily similar header into the catchfence in '93. My view has always been - keep the packs bunched up together, the law of averages dictates cars will get airborne, and the law of averages dictates a car will eventually fly into the stands. The problem with plate racing - two problems, really. The tracks were made to be the fastest, but never to contain a pack of fourty-three cars running inches away from each other for five hundred miles, and the cars are just too equal. Everyone is afraid to lift or tap the brake or pull out of line because they're going to lose five, ten, twenty positions. The solution? Not so sure. I don't think just eliminating "slam - drafting" as Earnhardt, Jr. coined it would help matters. I think we need to make the cars drive worse. Increase the speeds, 200 - 205, bring handling back into the equation. Daytona is not nearly as bad as Talladega because Daytona is very difficult to run full throttle around ... at 'dega, it's all about raw speed, not handling. Totally remove most if not all of the fender bracing. If you split up the packs, let them go a bit faster, bring handling back into the equation ... Eh, I don't know. I doubt we'll see any major changes, as the illiterate Alabama faithful come to see thirty cars smashed aflame in the infield, wasted by halfway, more interested in the strippers in the infield and in front of them - then those same idiots jump onto the highway and, thinking they're Bill Elliott doing a qualifying run in '87, kill someone. 22. Mike D posted: 10.13.2005 - 2:55 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Yea that's the worst part. No changes will be made. As you said, people enjoy seeing the 20+ car crashes. Anyway, you're right there's no real good solutions. I've presented my ideas already so I won't say them again. 23. Jr. Fan posted: 10.13.2005 - 9:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Good point about Le Mans. 24. D posted: 11.12.2005 - 2:53 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Chicago wrote: "Obviously NASCAR cares more about the money they get from the redneck beer drinking illegible crowd of Alabama residents who go to Talladega to get drunk..." Illegible? You mean nobody could see them? Or do you mean illiterate? Either way, you're an idiot. 25. Gus T. posted: 11.12.2005 - 3:15 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Like someone else said, I used to like plate-racing. But this bump-drafting stuff is ruining it. Make the front bumpers a little weaker, or get rid of the plates. 26. CBCMikeyfan posted: 11.26.2005 - 3:58 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I don't know if that was me you were referring to or not, Gus, but it's the drivers that are making the mistakes. Restrictor plates don't just automatically cause big wrecks. There have been many races where big wrecks didn't happen. My suggestion is go back to the package where they had the roof fin and the wicker on the rear spoiler. They didn't really need to bump draft then because they could get runs on people and actually pass them without much help. Made for good racing, too. 27. Thomas posted: 12.01.2005 - 9:17 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) CBCMikeyfan, you are absolutely correct. The roof fins were awesome. The races had 49 or so lead changes, and there weren't as many crashes, and little or no bump drafting. And for any of you who criticize Alabama fans, come on, just grow up. If they didn't want to see a good race, then they would not have come. They didn't come to see strippers in the infield. 28. Matthew Sullivan posted: 12.22.2005 - 4:15 am Rate this comment: (0) (1) This race marked the first time since 1997 that an Earnhardt did not win at a restrictor plate track. Funnily enough, with Dale Jarrett's win, the streak of a driver named "Dale" winning at a restrictor plate track continues, this being the eighth year in a row. 29. Gus T. posted: 12.28.2005 - 3:16 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I agree with you CBCMikey that the plates don't cause the crashes. I remember great plate races as well, even as late as 2004. The problem is that the drivers aren't willing to tap the break early in the race, and would rather slam into somebody, than lose a few positions. And the way things are looking, they're just going to keep wrecking until somebody does something. 30. Anonymous posted: 01.14.2006 - 11:02 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) This is actually the 10th year in a row that a 'Dale' won a plate race. The streak started in 1996 with Dale Jarrett's second Daytona 500 victory. 31. Steve posted: 03.14.2006 - 9:19 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) Mike D, I think you're going to get your wish in 2008 or 2009 when the "Car of Tomorrow" (COT) debuts on restrictor plate tracks. One of the aerodynamic changes to the COT makes the cars bigger and boxier, more like the cars from the 70's. I personally like the 2001 aero package. Record lead changes, few cautions (a grand total of 8 in all four plate races), and great racing! Not sure why they got rid of it. Uh, D, Chicago DID say illiterate, not illegible. Speaking of racing from the 70's, I love that new show "Back In the Day" with Junior. One of the races they showed featured Ricky Rudd, making his 3rd career start. The show is on Mondays at 9PM Eastern on SPEED. I'll bet there's at least 5 drivers in one of those races that you've never even heard of. (There were for me!) 32. Steve posted: 06.13.2006 - 10:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Kurt Busch was leading when he hit the wall in Turn 4. He rallied back to finish eigth! Bobby Hamilton Jr drove Bob Jenkins' (not from ESPN) car after failing to qualify. I don't know what the point of this was; he had failed to qualify earlier in the year without getting into another car. Tony Raines finished 22nd, his best of the year, and the only Top 25 finish for the team that was NOT scored by Kevin Lepage. 33. Thomas posted: 07.19.2006 - 4:07 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) The Bobby Hamilton Jr. deal was weird, and it was the opening of yet another Pandora's Box that would continue to the Coke 600 in 2006 where after failing to qualify, Michael Waltrip "bought" the #74 car driven by Derrike Cope, yet put NAPA and #55 on it. What happened at Talladega in October 2005 was this: Bobby Hamilton Jr. failed to qualify his #32 Tide Chevrolet for owner Cal Wells. Wells had a factory support deal with Chevy, so he had to find another Chevy that made the race. The only other non-full time Chevy team (besides Kerry Earnhardt) was that of Mike Skinner's #00 Aaron's Chevy. So, Bobby actually ran the #00 car with Tide on it, however, since fans and the corporation are familiar with the Tide car being #32, they changed the number to 32. Hermie Sadler drove an unsponsored #34 Ford and made the race, but gave up his ride to Mike Skinner, who had the big-time Aaron's deal. Hence, Skinner actually drove the #34 Ford, but once again, since people were used to seeing the #00 "Aaron's Dream Machine", they ran the number 00. 34. Thomas posted: 07.24.2006 - 4:12 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) By the way, I don't know what was more exciting about this race: the crashes (admit it, they are fun to watch every once in a while), the battle for the win that was eventually soured by an idiotic yellow flag, or Kyle Petty's triumphant and successful attempt to cross the finish line after crashing to bring out that aforementioned rogue caution flag that ended the race. 35. Rusty posted: 07.26.2006 - 5:41 am Rate this comment: (0) (1) "The only TRUE perfect solution is to get rid of the plates, which would mean flattening the turns. That or get rid of Daytona and Talladega..." Get rid of Daytona???? For what another cookie cutter, you surely arent a true race fan if you even consider getting rid of the birthplace of NASCAR......... 36. Brian posted: 10.16.2006 - 11:18 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I am a true fan. Hence the ...afterwards because obviously you could never get rid of those tracks. 37. Brock posted: 01.16.2007 - 7:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) . . .and Kyle Petty finished running, limping his annihilated #45 across the line after crashing hard on the backstretch to bring out the final caution! 38. Anonymous posted: 03.07.2007 - 6:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "By the way, I don't know what was more exciting about this race: the crashes (admit it, they are fun to watch every once in a while)" Yeah, especially if a driver is almost injured (David Ruetimann's crash last week was my favorite, the way he was all hunched over was so cool!) I love it when drivers are injured it's so exciting and fun to watch. Especially when the cars flip over and the cars go into 1 million pieces. My favorite crash was Geoff Bodine in the 2000 Daytona CTS race. Boy that was fun to watch! Idiot. 39. Steve.M. posted: 05.24.2007 - 9:40 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Rusty Wallace actually held the points lead during this race when Johnson got in the 1st big wreck and blew a tire. Looked as if Wallace was gonna be great but then during the 2nd big one he just got his nose cliped by someone and screwed up his race to a 25th and droped in points. I still had faith in old rusty but it wasnt to be in 2005. Was real fun to see him up there though. 40. JarrettFan44 posted: 08.22.2007 - 4:52 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I pray to God that this is not gonna DJ's last win I hope he can pull at least one more off 41. James W. McLaughlin posted: 08.25.2007 - 2:33 pm Rate this comment: (1) (0) Parts of this race were used in the "Talladega Nights" movie. Am I right? 42. DieselDan posted: 12.10.2007 - 4:39 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) To fix the speeds at Talladega, plow the turns down to a more reasonable 23 degrees, or a parabolic 20-26 degrees like Homestead. NASCAR's R&D has Rusty Wallace test a car there without a restrictor plate before he retired. He was averaging 248mph a lap and was pale with fear when he got out of the car. 43. Mr. Big posted: 05.18.2008 - 2:33 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Maybe the best race of 2005. Filled with excitement, and Dale's move is something I still remember even now. 44. Steve.M. posted: 06.09.2008 - 8:51 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Offically now Dale Jarrett's Final Cup Series Win 45. Clayton posted: 08.31.2008 - 9:19 am Rate this comment: (1) (1) the Call was much like Jarrett's career "and on the high side is.... DALE JARRETT! Where did he come from?" He came out of nowhere, that's what makes Dale so great!! 46. Anonymous posted: 02.16.2010 - 2:24 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Probably Yates Racing's final win in the Cup series along with Jarett's. 47. Destroyahirismix666 posted: 09.07.2010 - 4:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) Hmm, i see a ton of comments on how plate racing shoulda been done away with, and i think we all saw out that played out in this same race 4 years later, not much difference, two cars flipped, two big ones, race still ended under caution, Kurt Busch still crashed in both events. Geez. Why is everyone knocking this race, and JJ? This has got to be the greatest NASCAR race I've ever known! And JJ has got to be the greatest Driver Nascar has had since King Richard, surpassing even the late Dale Earndhart. 48. joey2448 posted: 04.25.2011 - 3:11 am Rate this comment: (1) (0) Oh if only the NASCAR fans of 2005 could see the kind of racing we have now....the two car tandem draft. 49. Destroyahirismix666 posted: 04.25.2011 - 9:20 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Re-reading the comments, the ideas to do away with this is pretty stupid. Knock off banking at Talladega and Daytona: What!? And have a over-sized Kansas or Charlotte? I like both tracks alot, but we'd be looking at more cookie-cutters, nevertheless more than likely, we'll get an over-sized Michigan, which is probably the worst and most overrated track on the schedule outside of Vegas and Cali. Weaken the bumpers: Wanna see Indy cars race at Chicago? That's what you'd get. Granted, IZOD @ Chicago is fun, but one tap, and it's over. You'd still have the huge crashes and big flips. Anyone remember 2010 there? So realistically, that won't change much. Bring back 1970's Stock cars: Sure, sure. Very nice. Save for the fact that...They weren't safe. The number of fatalities and bad injuries from the 1970's and early 80's were terrible. Remember the 1979 Don Williams' fatal crash? It sure seems A-LOT like a modern day plate race, ton of cars crashing, and huge near flips with flames. Despite how 'retero' and how much fan-base would be brought back, it's to risky. And it would cost to much to make one certain type of car for 32 races of the season, and 7 others with this. Take these tracks off the schedule: Wait, what? Daytona is the birthplace of NASCAR, Daytona beach was great, and Daytona had that amazing caution free run in 1959 with that amazing 3-wide finish! Get rid of that history!? Talladega has brought us some any great memories and side-by-side finishes that it can't be eliminated! Should we ditch that history also? Should we also knock off Martinsville, Infenion, Watkins Glen, Darlington and Bristol while we are at it, to make it 1.5 mile after 1.5 mile 30 times over!? We've had bad crashes at those tracks, and who remembers the 1948 incident where at Martinsville a car did a slow-style flip into the stands? Ken Schrader's roll over in 1999 was horrible, and he was trapped under the car! Gordon's crash in 2009 at the Glen was evil, and Johnson's in 2000 was bad! Jr.s scared out of his pants of Darlington, and Jr. knows best, so ditch it, and we don't want anything to do with Rusty Wallace's near-fatal flip there at Bristol Tennessee! See the double-speak? Install small, unrestricted v-6 engines: OH yes, sure! Who remembers the flip into Lake Loyd in 1994 in the dash series with a V-4 engine? Remember then bad incidents the v-6 brought us in the Busch *Now nationwide* Series? Anyone? I sure do! And like I said earlier, it would cost to much to make one certain type of car for 32 races of the season, and 7 others with this. And my issue with commentor #38: What an idiot. Granted, alot of people enjoy the huge crashes! Is that a sin? DO you want to watch a Running race where ntohing exciting happens? OH, THey're going fast, I like it! THere's a lead chagne! Seriously??? People like you are the stereotype JJ's sucks, Jr *OR kyle, it alternates* it's going to win 50 championships and 8,000 races, Talladega should be knocked off with Daytona, and we should only go to places where said 88 and 18 can win! Which counters your own point, because those drivers do best at super-speedways and short tracks. Idiot. Still, the greatest NASCAR race ever. Period. 50. Rusty posted: 05.09.2011 - 7:13 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Kerry Earnhardt's last Cup race as of 2011. 51. Destroyahirismix666 posted: 04.30.2012 - 10:02 am Rate this comment: (1) (0) Ehhh, okay, maybe not the greatest race ever, but one of the better ones. 52. Daniel posted: 05.24.2012 - 11:21 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) In using fastest 43: #09 Johnny Sauter & #32 Bobby Hamilton Jr. Out using fastest 43: #2 Rusty Wallace & #29 Kevin Harvick 53. CBASS posted: 01.20.2013 - 9:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Sponsor updates #00 Aaron's Dream Machine #77 Kodak #10 Checkers #16 Post-It #21 Motorcraft/ Ford Parts & Service http://www.motorsport.com/nascar-cup/photos/main-gallery/?y=2005&s=5&dl=a&r=1976 54. b4il3y posted: 05.25.2014 - 3:47 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) After all this ... things havent changed a bit :) 55. Nascar Lead Lap Points posted: 08.01.2014 - 1:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Withdrew 92 Mike Skinner Front Row Motorsports Chevy Bob Jenkins http://www.jayski.com/stats/2005grids/2005tss2-entry.htm 56. Schroeder51 posted: 09.27.2014 - 11:49 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) The fifth caution of this race was for the #5 of Kyle Busch hitting the turn 4 wall, not the #45 of Kyle Petty. 57. JJ24 posted: 07.05.2015 - 9:09 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Last Career Win for Dale Jarrett 58. NASCARLover22 posted: 08.11.2015 - 7:55 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Sponsor update: #00-Aaron's Dream Machine 59. RaceFanX posted: 09.12.2015 - 11:00 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) This ultimately proved to be Kerry Earnhardt's final Cup start. 60. numbah10hatah posted: 01.02.2016 - 11:17 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Why is Bobby Hamilton Jr. in the results and the DNQ list? 61. numbah10hatah posted: 01.02.2016 - 11:25 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Okay, so I found on Wikipedia that Hamilton Jr DNQ'd, then his team bought the #92 that Skinner qualified, then put on the Tide logos and put Hamilton in it...so doesn't that mean that Hamilton Jr. actually drove the #92 in the race? It also says that Skinner's team bought the #34 that Hermie Sadler qualified...so doesn't that mean that Skinner drove the #34 car in the race, and Hermie Sadler withdrew in the #00? 62. kevin20fan posted: 01.04.2016 - 8:59 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Hamilton Jr. and Skinner still carried the #32 and #00 in the race despite purchasing the rides from other teams. That's why Bob Jenkins is listed as the owner of Hamilton's car when his original entry was fielded by Cal Wells. It's just another one of those confusing situations created by NASCAR allowing the teams to play these games with numbers/owner points/ride-buying etc. 63. Big Mac Fan posted: 01.28.2016 - 9:28 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Dale Jarrett's only points paying win with the UPS logo created in 2003. The other 7 came with the logo created in 1961 by Paul Rand. 64. Braindead Zombie posted: 06.30.2016 - 12:14 pm Rate this comment: (2) (0) Jeff Burton's on-board during the second big one is one of the scariest things I've ever seen. As he spun towards Riggs' flipping car it looked like he was driving into a tornado. Can't even imagine what Jeff was thinking. 65. Maverick11 posted: 07.18.2016 - 2:22 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) In the 2nd big one, Kurt Busch just barely got by a spinning Casey Mears. Had he been a foot to the right, we could've had two Scott Riggs-esque crashes in one wreck... 66. Jim posted: 09.12.2016 - 1:57 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) last race for J.J. Yeley in the JGR #11 67. Jason24 posted: 09.12.2016 - 2:40 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) #41 That is correct, re-watching the broadcast years later you could see the pit stall that was being used for filming. You could also see Will Ferrell in the background during pre race interviews with some of the drivers. 68. Luke posted: 04.21.2018 - 3:47 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) So we should put Hermie Sadler No. 34 Ford as Withdrew since he gave up his ride to Skinner run (and Skinner changed the number to 00 but still use the owners points) 69. Bob posted: 05.31.2018 - 5:36 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) @68 No. 34 Hermie Sadler should be listed as DC (Driver Change) instead of withdrew (because the entry still ran - even with Skinner behind the wheel and change of numbers too - 34 to 00) - but still a William Edwards (Mach 1 motorsports entry and still a Ford like No. 34 original one - Skinner initial car was a Chevy but his gave up to Hamilton) so should be a Driver Change 70. Anthony posted: 01.30.2019 - 4:56 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Greg Biffle would have won the championship had he not been caught up in a wreck in this race 71. Tarheel posted: 01.30.2019 - 7:40 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) 70, you could make that non argument for any driver that's been involved in any close title fight. I wasn't a fan of Stewart or Biffle, but Stewart won that title fair and square. Maybe if Biffle was better on short tracks he would have won the title anyway. Maybe if Biffle hadn't wrecked in this race Stewart would have finished a lot higher than 15th at homestead and beaten him anyway. 72. Anthony posted: 03.06.2019 - 12:33 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Kevin Harvick originally qualified 2nd, but was put down to 42nd for his qualifying time being disqualified. 73. Anonymous posted: 01.05.2020 - 12:47 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I do see both Rusty Wallace, and Mike Bliss caught in the first big one as well should be a 9 car wreck. 74. Foote posted: 04.04.2020 - 2:45 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) After (literally) crying through an interview after Kevin Harvick bumped him in the turn and triggered a huge crash in the Gatorade Duel to start the year, Jim Johnson triggers a nasty crash on lap 20 when he picks Elliott Sadler's tires off the ground for no reason entering turn 1. Mike Waltrip flipped several times. 75. SweetRich posted: 06.29.2020 - 9:32 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) The commentators were Bill Weber, Benny Parsons and Wally Dallenbach. The pit road reporters were Matt Yocum, Allen Bestwick, Marty Snider and Dave Burns. 76. Danny posted: 02.22.2021 - 2:31 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) during this race they touched on the Houston Astros winning their game to make the 2005 playoffs against the Cubs ironically. But it wouldn't be the first time those two teams would be connected related to a NASCAR race in 2005. And it was because Jeff Gordon who actually sang or tried to sing take me out to the ball game and the Wrigley Field crowd booed him, and he had said it was Wrigley Stadium not a good idea to do that beforehand or crowd boos you it was later reference in a youtube video known as Jeff Gordon's worst weekend ever, otherwise his worst race period if you can put it that way. 77. TeamDCRfan posted: 03.05.2021 - 7:28 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Kyle Petty was like, Im gonna finish this damn race if it takes all night ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Post a comment:* Your comment may not appear immediately - all comments must be approved by the moderator. Name: Comment: