|| *Comments on the 2008 Ford 400:* View the most recent comment <#149> | Post a comment <#post> 1. petty43 posted: 11.16.2008 - 8:28 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) congrats to jimmie and his team. they are clearly the only team who can handle the pressure of the chase without any mistakes. no reason to think they wont win it all for another 3 years in a row!!!!!!!! 2. petty43 posted: 11.16.2008 - 8:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) of course if they do there will be no more fans in nascar. 3. petty43 posted: 11.16.2008 - 8:33 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) i really do not understand why fans hate him so. he has never done ANYTHING questionable on the track or off, I like that he just lets his championships speak for themselves, o well boo hoo for carl he just gets so close now twice and yet cannot get over the hump, he might be the only guy who can challenge the 48 but he has to learn to work with his teammates like jj does. i think he is a tool anyway. i am tired of his whole life is so great if you just work your butt off act, just be honest carl you hate getting beat by the 48 hate and show some emotion, like rusty wallace and DW used to when dale sr was whopping their butts 4. Ryan D posted: 11.16.2008 - 8:54 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Congrats on JJ's third championship in a row!. Good to see McMurray have another good run! Nice job by Kahne, Kvapil and Mears. Stewarts last ride in the #20 5. 18fan posted: 11.16.2008 - 9:12 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I watched the first 60 laps and had to go somewhere. Kenseth complained about letting Carl lead because he said they never give it back to me. Carl once again proves he can't win with a fast car because the last two race that he dominated he had to win on fuel mileage because Bob Osborne can't make good calls with a dominant car. Jimmie won the title. If there wasn't a chase Carl would have won the title. Kyle could not buy a break in the chase as he was third with three laps to go and finished 19th. Same can be said for Kenseth who was leading with three to go and finished 25th. He and Gordon didn't win this year along with Harvick. All had winning streaks of at least five years. First year without a win for Gordon since 1993. Also he first season without two wins since 1993. On a different note, does anybody know how the points system worked in 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971, 1972, and 1973. 6. 18fan posted: 11.16.2008 - 9:40 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Some other things I forgot to mention. This was Kyle's 150th career start. Tony had one of the best cars but finished 9th in his last race in the #20. Regan Smith will probably win rookie of the year simply by Hornish's DNQ. A.J. ran well again in the 10 car. Reed might be able to do well if the car runs like it is right now. Vickers ran the 84 and got it ahead of the 47 of Ambrose and into the top-35. Another great run by McMurray. I expect a lot form him next year. A.J. should get the 41 because it might be better with EGR and he is way more talented than Reed. Interesting, Kurt finished second last week and last this week. Last race for the following drivers in their current cars, not teams: Clint Bowyer(5th) Casey Mears(8th) Tony Stewart(9th) A.J. Allmendinger(11th) Bill Elliott?(12th) Scott Riggs(14th) Juan Pablo Montoya, last with Ganassi(17th) Ryan Newman(21st) Paul Menard(30th) Reed Sorenson(31st) Regan Smith(34th) Will not be back because of EGR unless he drives the 41 Tony Raines(37th). 7. kirkyal posted: 11.16.2008 - 10:05 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Jimmie Johnson! No matter what you think about him, the chase etc, he is one awesome driver! Massive congrats to him! Will go down as one of the all time greats! Also Carl Edwards he is gonna be champion soon, great season for him!! Look out for Ragan next year, thats my pick! Well done Jimmie! 8. Spen posted: 11.16.2008 - 10:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) 18fan: From '69-71 the point system worked like this: for half-mile or shorter race tracks, the winner got fifty points, with a one-point drop for every other car. For tracks half-mile to one mile in length, the winner recived one-hundred points, with a two-point drop for everyone else. And for tracks longer than a mile, one-hundred and fifty points to the winner, with a three point drop. Not sure about the other years; I didn't pay much attention to the points race at the time. I believe the information can be found on Wikipedia. And in all probability, this will not be Bill's last race in the #21. (I hope not, anyway. I'd like to see him join the eight-hundred start club.) 9. Bronco posted: 11.16.2008 - 10:33 pm Rate this comment: (1) (0) The Cha$e claims another victim, this time Carl Edwards. Imagine Carl leading the race with Jimmie in 15th, and Carl praying his fuel would last so that he could win a championship, that's some real drama, not this artificial Cha$e crap. I'm pretty disappointed with Dale Jr. There was so much hype about him changing teams, and when he dominated Speedweeks I thought we'd be seeing a repeat of his strong 2004 season. Instead his season started off strong, and then pretty much nosedived after Michigan which was only a fuel mileage win. And now he finished the Cha$e dead last. He led the 4th highest number of laps this season and yet his team couldn't turn that into wins. Tony's last ride in the Home Depot machine and he finishes with a solid top 10. It's going to be weird seeing not seeing Tony and Home Depot, like it was with Dale Jr. and Budweiser. Great runs for Riggs, Mears, Kvapil, and McMurray scores three straight third place finishes. AJ once again beat Sadler for the fifth week in a row and finishes strong. Also Awesome Bill proves he still has his Homestead magic with a great finish. It's unfortunate that Jimmie gets to tie Cale's record because of how stupid the points system is. A champion is the best guy over a season, period. The first season with the new car proved to be a flop I think. It was supposed to save teams money, create parity and improve racing. However teams are going broke, 3 drivers won 2/3 of the races and it seems like most races are determined by clean air instead of racing. Congrats to Regan Smith on winning ROTY, hopefully he will be back next year. 10. neckcar posted: 11.16.2008 - 10:49 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) congrats to carl.. the actual champion under real points 11. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.16.2008 - 11:29 pm Rate this comment: (1) (0) For the second time in 3 weeks, Carl has the dominant car but has to save fuel big time to win. Darrell Waltrip eat your heart out. We may have a new master at saving gas. Great ability by Bob to recognize they need to save fuel and get Carl to save before it is too late. They will be a force to be reckoned with for many years to come. Overall, this ends a very flat year for the Sprint Cup. Can you imagine the drama if there had been no Chase? Carl's fuel gamble would have been for the championship, which he would have won. Jimmie would have had to try to save fuel too. NASCAR has just sucked all the life out of this wondeful sport. 3 drivers win 2/3 of the races. Whoever gets out front in the COT just leaves everyone. Very few exciting races. I really hope they make changes to bring this sport back. Banning testing will help I think. The reason the 48 team won is because they threw so much money at it and tested everywhere they could. Otherwise Roush would have lapped them. But seriously, something needs to give. This has always been my #1 sport to watch by a large margain, but I am so relieved that this season is over. For the last 2 months I just wanted it to end. Hell, coming here to discuss the races has been the most exciting part for me. I hope to talk to you guys again next season. It has been a blast. I just wish we had something better to talk about. On a sad note, this following week will see MANY crew members laid off. I just hate that for them. They gave their careers to NASCAR, not to mention their hearts and souls. They sacrificed family time to follow this sport, and now they will be enemployed. NASCAR is just paying for growing too fast. They made way too many short sighted decisions, and it is costing the heart and soul of this sport. Typical business I guess. 12. Kit posted: 11.16.2008 - 11:34 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) [quote]he has never done ANYTHING questionable on the track or off, I like that he just lets his championships speak for themselves[/quote] He's a Jeff Gordon clone and a corporate yes man. He's a very boring addition to a sport that's already getting boring enough as it is. And guess what? With the traditional point system, this season would have been MORE EXCITING to watch. And without the COT (which does not belong in STOCK CAR racing), we would have had much better racing to watch. From here on out, all I care about is the truck series. The Cup series is a snoozefest. 13. 99 Carl posted: 11.16.2008 - 11:34 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Even though Jeff Gordon, Matt Kenseth, and Kevin Harvick didn't win at all this year, this was the first year in a long time that there was not a first time winner for a season. 14. Kit posted: 11.16.2008 - 11:36 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Oh, and I don't want to hear about Jimmie Johnson accomplishing something that only Cale Yarborough could do. Cale won under an entirely different points system, one which did not penalize drivers for dominant performance (like Jeff Gordon last year). 15. 18fan posted: 11.17.2008 - 1:27 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I have no idea what happened to Kyle. I think he ran out of gas because ABC( whose broadcasts are just as bad as TNT with an equally bad play-by-play announcer)showed him passing Ragan with like 2 to go and then they didn't mention him and he finished 19th, a lap down. Amazingly, that is Kyle's best finish at Homestead. He really sucks at Homestead, but it is a good track with good racing. 16. Steve posted: 11.17.2008 - 1:39 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Congrats to JJ for Cup number 3! Seriously, REGAN SMITH is ROtY??? Not that there was much competition. Carpentier lost his ride, Villeneuve and Franchitti lost sponsorship, and Hornish DNQ at a track he won at 4 1/2 years ago. Great result for Kvapil, Allmendinger, and Elliott!!! Go Awesome Bill!!! 17. Zed_3_88fan4eva posted: 11.17.2008 - 1:57 am Rate this comment: (0) (1) Well I have to give props to Johnson. Im not a big fan of him but I have top tip my cap to Jimmie and the entire 48 team Great run for Elliott showing he can still run if he had somewhat decent equipment. Tony Stewart in his final ride for Gibbs comes home a respectable 9th and Jamie McMurray and Travis Kvapil are going to be the two dark-horses for 09' And maybe Allmendinger might have a good 09' As for 2008 I remember saying after the 500 that Reed Sorenson was going to have a breakout season.....wrong lol not even top 20 in points. Am I the only one dissapointed about Jr.'s season...I know it was a good year but I guess I was expecting a little more idk. Micheal McDowell has taken Steven Wallace's place as the most dangerous "driver" on the race track. Shrub has an amazing first 26 races but to my delight chokes on his own ass in the chase First full year of COT yields half decent racing. Goodyear sucks Never woulda thought Gordon and Kenseth would go winless in a year especially the year gordon came off of. Teresa finally unloads her late husbands team.....feel bad for taking her side awhile ago. For 2009 I think Mark Martin will finally win his championchip unless someone screws him outta it. I think Jr will pull off a top 5 year next year with 2-3 wins David Ragan and Jamie McMurray will make the chase with all of their Roush temates with Travis Kvapil (if yates can get a good sponser) missing the chase by very little. Im also looking at AJ Allmendinger pulling off a top 20 pts season with maybe a win at one of the road courses. Also Logano will probably only manage a top 20 season. JJ Yeley and Micheal McDowell still wont have rides. Kyle Busch will still be hated And Brian France will still have his head up his ass I know im forgeting somethin but ill end it here. Cant wait for Daytona in Feburary or January for testing. 18. Kit posted: 11.17.2008 - 3:27 am Rate this comment: (1) (0) Could someone explain to me what it means to win a championship in the Cup Series? I thought it meant the driver with the best season relative to others, but apparently not: Carl Edwards 9 wins 19 top 5s 27 top 10s 1 pole 9.5 average finish Jimmie Johnson 7 wins 15 top 5s 22 top 10s 6 poles 10.5 average finish The ONLY category that Johnson beats Edwards in is in poles. So what in the world is the point of the championship if it does not reward the driver and the team who performed the best in the season? Clearly Jimmie Johnson and the #48 were not the best team of the season. 19. Mark O. posted: 11.17.2008 - 6:25 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Finishing 34th and winning Rookie of the Race honors is pathetic. No one should have been awarded the prize...I don't believe a single top 10 was scored by a rookie this year. Hell of a run by A.J. Allmendinger...remind me why he got canned by Red Bull? 20. Anonymous posted: 11.17.2008 - 7:51 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Good job Jimmie Next year Carl Edwards will win the title 21. DaleJrFan17 posted: 11.17.2008 - 8:50 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Didnt even bother watching this. Grats Carl for winning the race and the Championship! 22. the cha$e posted: 11.17.2008 - 12:27 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) the chase strikes out finally with 3 failures out of 5, to produce a champion that matches the ACTUAL Champ. I remeber in 05 and 06 all the hickcar writers, and pundits were saying that the CHA$E was money cause "if we the viewers would notice, the real championship and fake one were almost always gonna be won by the same dude, showing us that if you were the best driver all year long, you would still win out at the end." Wrong NECKAR. Wow, know i got to look at JJ 3 time Champ, and THE CARL a ZERO Time champ. And of course Gordon with only 4. This is BS. JJ your 1 time Champ.. OOOOPPPPPSSSS... I measn 3... IN A ROWWWW! Long live Hickcar and it's cheerleaders. Long live the CHA$E, and The RACE to THE ChA$e and whatever. NASCAR SUCKS 23. the cha$e posted: 11.17.2008 - 12:31 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) I am sure there happy with the result they get to pedal though cause now NASTYCAR gets to Hawk us THE GREATEST DRIVER OF ALLTIME--------JJ!!!!! JUST like early in the year we were supposed to beleive Kyle Busch was having the greates season ever... Some In the press even went as far as to declare this as a fact, and would make silly statements to how "this was better that Gordon in 98, already and were only half way through it!!!! See regardless of were his season ends up it's better you'll see!!!" EPIC FAIL 24. the cha$e posted: 11.17.2008 - 12:32 pm Rate this comment: (1) (1) Good job Jimmie Next year Carl Edwards will win the title | 11.17.08 - 7:51 am HE won it already... This year 25. 29PennzoilChevy09 posted: 11.17.2008 - 12:34 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) A terrible end to a terrible season. Thankfully Harvick finished second, and I can go into the winter feeling like they have a chance at the championship after finishing 4th in the points this season despite being winless. 26. the cha$e posted: 11.17.2008 - 12:36 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Why didn't we hear all the Arguments that were used last year to justify JJ beating Gordon even though he lost by over 200... You all remember the arguments used about how "Johnson is the real CHamp cause he won more races!!!!!" Guess since this year the guy with less wins is champ, the same excuse don't fly... Long Live TAXICABCAR... YEEEEEEHHHHHAWWWWWWWWWW!!!!!!!!!!! 27. tyme posted: 11.17.2008 - 7:13 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I am glad I stopped watching a month ago. Saved me a lot of time that would have just been wasted on nothing. What a terrible season, NASCAR should be ashamed of themselves. The only NASCAR series I'm watching next year is the trucks and maybe nationwide for humour. Thanks Brian France. 28. petty43 posted: 11.17.2008 - 9:09 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) for those who wish to complain that carl would have won by 16 points, (under old system)they should remember also that if carl had not wrecked himself and his teammates at talladega he WOULD be champion!!!!!!!!!! also he finished 30th at lowes the next week, on a 1.5 mile track no less, the very kind of track he dominated all year long. he still needs to develop his plate track finishes, road courses, and martinsville to compete with jimmie. 29. A *TRUE* NASCAR Fan posted: 11.17.2008 - 9:26 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Anyone who says "thats it im not watchin NA$CAR anymore" is full of feces, plain and simple. Every damn one of you will be watching come Daytona and you know it. None of us will ever change NASCAR and there's nothing we can do about it, so just shut up and watch. Boo hoo, your favorite driver didn't win, tough crap. Go tell your mommy and maybe she'll give you milk and cookies. 30. Hickcar posted: 11.17.2008 - 11:15 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) for those who wish to complain that carl would have won by 16 points, (under old system)they should remember also that if carl had not wrecked himself and his teammates at talladega he WOULD be champion!!!!!!!!!! also he finished 30th at lowes the next week, on a 1.5 mile track no less, the very kind of track he dominated all year long. he still needs to develop his plate track finishes, road courses, and martinsville to compete with jimmie. petty43 | 11.17.08 - 9:09 pm BS... He's better on road courses, and equal on the others.... JJ's just better on the coookie cutters that require no skill, but make up 95% of the schedule 31. Kit posted: 11.18.2008 - 1:33 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) "if carl had not wrecked himself" No, if we had an actual points system that rewards the driver with the best season, Carl would be champion. Carl had a better 2008 season than Jimmie. "Anyone who says "thats it im not watchin NA$CAR anymore" is full of feces, plain and simple." Actually, I don't even remember the last time I saw an actual Cup race on TV, maybe a few months ago. I just hear about them on this site and tidbits on the news. Only series I care to sit down and watch is the truck series. "None of us will ever change NASCAR and there's nothing we can do about it, so just shut up and watch." There is something we can do about it: quit watching it and spending money on it. Considering that most of my favorite drivers are either retired or part-timers, that is very easy for me to do. 32. Bronco posted: 11.18.2008 - 2:18 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I have to say, I think the ESPN telecasts were a lot better than last year for some reason. Probably cause they have a good combination with the guys in the studio and the booth. Can't wait for FOX next year, with DW's funny ways and Larry Mac's southern accent. A few more things. Since they expanded the schedule to 36 races, Carl's 27 top 10 this year ranks only second to Jeff's 30 from last year. Also impressive was how he owned the 1.5 and 2 mile tracks this year. I wonder how Daytona in 2009 is going to look. We're going to see a lot of these current drivers disappear I bet... 33. Jesse posted: 11.18.2008 - 2:41 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Another close points race utterly ruined by the chase. I actually stopped watching several months ago which I am now very thankful for. 34. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.18.2008 - 12:14 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I don't want to hear anyone comparing Cale Yarborough's 3peat to Jimmie's. Jimmie would not have won it the last two years were it not for the phony Chase. Cale was the best for three consecutive SEASONS, Jimmie was the best for 3 consecutive 10 race stretches. No small feat, but still not as impressive. I just hate this chase system. It was made to "create excitement and drama", but that drama is totally fake. Football games would be more exciting if they reset the score 10-10 at the beginning of each game, but they don't Why? Because that would be phony and contrived. It is obvious that Brian France and the suits in NASCAR think we are idiots. Do they really think we will be excited when they are pulling strings and artificially tightening things. It just takes the air out of our sails. Other sports have playoffs because they need them (except college football). Every week different teams play different opponents in different locations in different conditions. One team may have a better record, but they may have had an easier schedule. In NASCAR every team is in the same location every week dealing with the same conditions. Did you blow a tire at Indy this year? Well guess what, everyone dealt with the exact same circumstances as you. So there is no need for it. And finally, perhaps the thing that gets my blood boiling the most, I don't want to hear "Jimmie dealt with much tougher competition than Cale." BULL SHIT Yes there are more cars that run the whole schedule, but let me ask this: Would you rather race in a 5 car race against David Pearson, Richard Petty, Bobby Allison, and Darrell Waltrip or would you want to race against this current 43 car field? I'd rather race today if I wanted to win. This is another thing NASCAR needs to realize, depth isn't very important if the top guys are great. Who cares if 35 cars finish on the lead lap if the battle for the lead is totally uncompetitive? That is the case over 30 times a year currently. Look at the 1976 Daytona 500, Richard and David were the only two cars that finished on the lead lap (I know technically Richard didn't finish but you get my point). I don't care if 12 drivers have a good shot at the championsip with 10races left, I want 2 drivers to be really close with 1 race left. Look at the Truck Series. Totally awesome. NASCAR robbed us of that this year. 35. petty43 posted: 11.18.2008 - 10:30 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) nascar should keep the chase but inmprove the cot, the races are boring and really that is what i enjoy the most, the title is great but you only care for 3 months and then it is back to racing, at daytona. the cot races are so predictable postions 1 thru 10 get spaced out after a couple laps and the best racing on the track is for 12 place or you can watch the "donkeys" in the back as biffle likes to call them. first i would rather see the racing improve and then fix the points. whether he would have won 3 titles in a row or not the fact that jimmie has already won 40 races is still very remarkable, i think it is more impressive than the 3 cups anyways and we should all hope our favorite drivers can someday reach that level, because right he is in a league of his own. also if he is nascars biggest star, then that is better than having a thug like kobe or randy moss, or some overpaid meathead like arod. at least jimmie is not a piece of $#!T and he earns his multi million dollars on the track with his performancce rather than having handed to him. 36. Kit posted: 11.19.2008 - 2:28 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) petty43, the chase is a joke and it doesn't reward the driver with the best season. What's the point of racing if you don't have to be the best racer of the season to win the championship? It's like letting the third-place car win the race. The COT doesn't belong in stock car racing. 37. Buster posted: 11.19.2008 - 4:07 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) y not 1994? 38. Anonymous posted: 11.20.2008 - 1:48 am Rate this comment: (1) (0) Last race for the Carl Edwards Office Depot pair, they had a tremendous run together. Wish Office Depot was staying because I don't really like the look of the Aflac car. Last race for AT&T in NASCAR, after being involved in the sport as Bellsouth and Cingular. NASCAR/Nextel chased out a longtime sponsor of the sport, good job. Last race for Cheerios and the 43 car. They never had much of a run, suprised they didn't leave sooner. Speaking of Cheerios, this race marks the fifth anniversary of Bobby Labonte's last win. Given the fact that he's driving a Petty Dodge without sponsorship for some reason I don't think we'll ever see him win again. 39. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.20.2008 - 3:19 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "Last race for AT&T in NASCAR, after being involved in the sport as Bellsouth and Cingular. NASCAR/Nextel chased out a longtime sponsor of the sport, good job." Thanks for pointing that out, that is something that has really disgusted me, something that NASCAR and Sprint should be extremely ashamed of themselves for. In today's economic situation to just chase a sponsor like that out is inexcusable. If AT&T would have stayed with Burton, which they wanted to do, CAT would have sponsored some other team, meaning less people get layed off and one more competitive car. They should be protecting THEIR series, but they are just hurting it. I will NEVER be a Sprint customer. Besides, they wouldn't allow Cingular to rebrand as AT&T, but guess what: THE SPRINT CUP SERIES IS REBRANDED FROM THE NEXTEL CUP!!! What a bunch of hypocrites and idiots. That is why NASCAR is in the crapper, they have people like that running the show. Just pathetic. Petty43, I jumped in on the "weakest championship" debate on the 2007 Homestead page. 40. petty43 posted: 11.20.2008 - 10:31 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) this post is targeted towards daleearnhardtsrfanforever so others may want to pass it by, as it will probably get quite long. this post is a response to the statement made on nov 18. I first off must say that i really respect and appreciate MOST of the contributions that you make here. and i to will always be a fan of the #3. but to quote you comparing Jimmie johnsons 3 peat and cale's 3 peat is not bull@^#*. my first point is this....ALL sports have become more....much much more competitive since the late 70's. that is why no one will ever win 5 world series in a row like the 50's yankees or no one will 8 peat again like the celtics and no one will ever win 4 super bowls in 6 years again like the 70's steelers or win 7 straight national titles like UCLA mens basketball. In fact Jimmie's 3 peat is the only one other than Jordan's bulls and the late 90's yankees, since cale's so show some respect. whether you like the chase or not the odds of anybody winning 3 in a row are very low, i will wager right now, that no one repeats that feat for at least 25 years. ok back to the racing argument. If i understand you correctly you are arguing that just because nascar is more competitive now than it was in the late 70's does not mean that jimmie's 3 peat is comparble to cale's. I believe that you surmise that racing against pearson petty allison and dw then was more challenging then winning against today's drivers. well take it from an old fan, your argument MAY NOT be quite so strong. First off cale pulled his 3 peat with junior johnson racing which from 1972 to 1992 was by far the best team in nascar, especially from 1973 to 1983. that was the entire span of cale's time there.from 1972 to 1992 Junior's 11 car finished first 6 times in points second 7 times and third thru fifth another 5 times. that leaves only 3 finishes outside of the top 5, two of those were affected by driver injuries. cale should have won the title in 1973 over benny and if pearson and the woods had run the full campaign in 76 pearson would have won that champioship by about 100 points. to figure this just take drivers points divide by races run and you get an average, multiply that by 30 since there were 30 races in 1976. so you see there is some controversary around cale's first title. david pearson and the woods sat out 8 races 8!!!!! in fact they sat out 8 races in 77 and 78 as well, so they were no threat to beat junior and cale. the next best team at that time was petty enterprises, but after 1975 they took a huge dive. just look at richards stats, hell in 1978 he did not even win a race for the first time since 1959!!!! he led far fewer laps from 76 thru 78 and it was because the petty's lost the factory support and after a couple years without it, they finally came back down from the high level they sustained from 1964 to 1972. Bobby Allison raced for 3 different teams from 76 to 78. in 76 he raced for penske and that team was not very good. in 77 he raced for his own team same results, in fact from 76 to 77 bobby did not win a single race and he led about 3500 fewer laps than cale, clearly he was also not a factor to beat cale for the title. or even win races. in 78 bobby drove for bud moore, who he did not get along with {imagine that}, he did win 5 races and led about half as many laps as cale, and finished a distant (500 plus points) 2nd to cale and junior. then there is DW. during 76 to 78 dw was a brash young inexperienced driver with a relativley young team that was growing. he was a lot like KB is now. he had a lot of talent but could not contain it to save his life and his team was about half as good as junior's during that span. in 76 he was no threat to cale at all, and in 77 and 78 he finished about 500 or more points behind cale each year with 6 wins a piece, while cale won 19 races. Cale at that time was just much better with a much better team. that team later helped dw get what digard could not get him, a title. the only other contender was lg dewitt and benny parsons, who beat cale and junior in 73 for the cup. they were at best a lot like RCR is today, a former championship team that really was not able to beat the elite teams like junior and the wood's or petty's. benny was not half the driver that cale was, and L.G. was a schill of what junior's team was. in fact at that time dewitt and the petty's were the only other teams racing that had won cups in the past. other elite teams like holman-moody and nord krauskopf and cotton owens were long gone. the late 70's were actually a down time for nascar, remember if you will that there was a bit of a economic crisis at that time much worse than what is happening now. take it from me i watched races from that era and most of them were not THAT competive. i bet from 76 to 78 there were at least 25 races that were won by over 30 seconds or more. sometimes the winner was the only one left on the lead lap, so you see petty and pearson and cale did not really race eachother at the finish all the time, in fact it rarely happened that way. to be honest cale probaly won those 3 titles by befault more than anything. none of them were even close at all. he clinched with at least a race to go. jimmie on the other hand DID have plenty of other drivers to beat, and he did beat them all, also over the last 3 years no other driver has more laps led top 5 top tens or win than jimmie and it is not even close in all categories ecept top ten were gordon is tied with him, so jimmie really HAS dominated the last 3 years. listen i am not really a jimmie fan, but I AM a NASCAR HISTORY FAN and i think most people do not really appreciate the history that has been made here, such as yourself. like the chase or not, it is the system we now have. and every team starts the season knowing that. i am tired of fans whining about the chase, these are the same fans who whined about how kenseth won his title in 03. well who are you crappin, which is it? jimmie's 3 peat is more impressive unfortunately and i honestly believe cale would even admit it himself. Back in the day we went to the races to meet our favorite drivers more than to see the races, and cale seemed like a pretty clear thinking fellow. 3 peats are rare today in sports and they should be celebrated not critisized. Jimmie is not brash like dw was or kyle is. he is not obnoxiuos like harvick or tony. he is not a clone or robot like kenseth or bowyer or kahne. he is not an ego maniac like carl or juan pablo. he is not a tool like denny hamlin or jaime mcmurray or kurt busch, and he is not a underachiever like dale jr or jeff gordon was this year. he is kind soft spoken, competivtive, and just flat out better than every other driver in cup right now, and nascar fans had better hope that somebody better than carl edwards or kyle busch comes along soon, or jimmie will win about 7 of these things in a row!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 41. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.21.2008 - 4:05 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) That's fair. You make a lot of really good points. First of all I take nothing from Jimmie, he is a great driver. His ability to stay calm in adverse situations is amazing and it is what has really separated him from the other drivers. When things go wrong, not only does he not get all pissy and down on his team, he actually raises his game and uses it as motivation to be even better. This has allowed him to accomplish more than drivers with more driving talent. I respect him as a racer WAY more than hotheads like Tony Stewart, Kevin Harvick, and Robby Gordon, all of whom I think have more driving talent but an unbelievable ability to act like children although they are all in their mid 30s. But to your point, I argue that competition is much deeper today.... for 5th place. From 5th to about 35th is very close, much closer than it ever was during Cale's era. Getting a Top 5 is way tougher today. Hell, in the past you could be 20 or 30 laps down and finish 5th. Today you can run 500 miles and finish 30th. BUT It seems the serparation nowadays between 1st and 5th is even further than it was. With NASCAR continuing to make this an IROC clone series, if one team finds the smallest little thing, it really separates them from the field. Look at this year: Kyle, Carl and Jimmie won 2/3 of all the races in a 36 race schedule. Not exactly parity. Another example is Tony Stewart in 2005. They were a 15th place car for the first 1/3 of the season but went to Michigan to test, figured something out, and combined with Tony deciding to act like an adult for once were totally unstoppable for the rest of the year. It seems to me that once you figure it out, you are only racing 3 or 4 teams for the top spot, like Cale in the 70s. Another reason for the tightening of the fields is that the cars are much more durable. Hardly anyone blows an engine anymore which used to claim half the top teams in every race. Plus debris cautions, lucky dogs, etc. I respect your postion as an observer from the 70s. I wasn't even alive until 1984 and my earliest memories of NASCAR are the 1989 title fight (heartbreaker). I always enjoy talking with people who were around to see it back then. I wish I could have been around then when it was truly a sport, not a business only. I also respect your veiws of the Chase, but I think that recently it is more a result of the widening of the gap I mentioned earlier. Look at 2004. Kurt Busch was unspectacular in the regular season and during the Chase, he just avoided problems for the most part during the last 10 while the others all had multiple issues. Even this year, look at RCR. Kevin Harvick finished 4th with no wins, very few laps led, and not really ever coming close to a win. Bowyer and Burton finish 5th and 6th with only 3 wins, 2 of which were complete luck. If it wasn't for the tremendous gap between Carl, Jimmie, and the Biff they could have contended for the Cup, which is beyond depressing. Bottom line: They need to reward wins more. 42. Brandon posted: 11.23.2008 - 9:53 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) If you ppl arent happy with the points standings, then don't watch. God dammit. You ppl complain about it not being competitive enough, then you go and complain when they do something about it. Im sorry Jr. didnt win, but maybe he's not good enough under any points system. And Jimmie and Cale may not have had the same points system, but Jimmie did it in the old car, the old car and the COT, and the COT. That's a feat, also there are far more competitive teams now then there was in the 70s. Jimmie is the perfect champion. He does it with class too. He doesnt wreck ppl, (like the 3 car did) and he says the right things. He couldjust say "Ah, no one is going to beat us!" and he'd be right, but he knows if he gets too high on his horse he will be beaten. So congrats to he and Chad Knaus, because what they did is astonishing and wont be done again for a long time. 43. Brandon posted: 11.23.2008 - 9:57 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Hey, heres a scary stat, if we had the current chase system in 1992, you know who would've been the champion... KYLE PETTY... scary huh?? 44. Willy on Wheels posted: 11.24.2008 - 8:42 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) No. I wish Kyle had won a championship during his prime 45. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.24.2008 - 10:25 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) No, that's not scary at all. Believe it or not, Kyle was actually a pretty good driver once. I know that is hard to believe now, but it is true. He won races and regularly contended for others. Unfortunately Felix Sabates was his owner. That prevented him from more wins. 46. Steve posted: 11.25.2008 - 4:10 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I gotta wonder, since NA$CAR has made a good move by outlawing testing (at Cup/Busch/Truck tracks, but Jack Roush is trying to get all of the teams to agree to not test at all), I wonder; how many entries next year will become R&D cars? Teams like Hendrick, Roush, and Childress may "demote" one of their drivers to be the "test dummy" on a given weekend. Perhaps they will create a partnership with a smaller team that will be like their test team. Or, the bad result of no tests would be an increase of Cup drivers and teams in the B-series. :( Does anybody have some thoughts concerning cost-cutting in NA$CAR? I do. 1: drop the purse money by $1 million or 2 at each race. Carl Edwards' team got $371,025 for winning this race, and I think the lowest payout was for Dave Blaney's 41st place finish at the Glen (&60,230); that's a bit frivolous. Think about it; $1 to $2 million less for each race is $36 to $72 million saved! 2: fewer races. Most veteran drivers have said they'd like to see the schedule drop to about 29 or 30 races; not so taxing on the teams (in terms of effort and finances). That's not only 6 or 7 less races to travel to, but also 6 of 7 less races to have to pay purse money to. 3: shorten some races. For instance, do we really need to race 500 miles (twice) at California? Or Pocono? 4: create a budget cap. Something like $5 million per team. Not per entry (#5, #24, #48, #88 for Hendrick = $20 million budget). Per team. That would make car owners re-think a multi-car team. 47. Dodge posted: 11.25.2008 - 3:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) It would be an easy choice for Childress for test dummy, Casey Mears. I say get rid of California Speedway completely and take one date from Pocono and move the distance for the oher one to 400 miles. Add another short track because that is where real racing is. One race in Phoenix, give Darlington back its second date. To replace California, Rockingham comes back once and go to North Wilkesboro once. Go back to 1 race at Texas, give Iowa a Cup date. Get Talladega out of the chase and put Rockingham there. 48. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.26.2008 - 12:18 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "It would be an easy choice for Childress for test dummy, Casey Mears." Ain't that the truth!!! I've got a feeling that will probably happen around the beginning of May when it is obvious Casey won't make the Chase. RCR might try doing stuff with his car that they don't normally do with their other cars, like giving it a motor that has a lot of horsepower and risk getting... RCR employees cover your ears... a blown engine. As for the schedule: Take away both California dates, give one to Rockingham for a 500 MILE race like they used to. One Texas date, one Atlanta date (give their Labor Day event to Darlington while also keeping the Mother's Day event), one Charlotte event, one Pocono event, one Michigan event (that track friggin sucks and the "Detroit pride" thing is out the window nowadays), and get rid of the All Star race, it has sucked for the last 16 years. There: 31 races over 32 weekends. That will give us some breaks so we don't get burned out like we do now. As for North Wilkesboro, I love that track. I went to a lot of races there as a kid and it is my favorite track I have ever been to. The racing was absolutely incredible and the atmosphere was great. Unfortunately it has been sitting around for 12 years now (burn in Hell, Bruton and Bob Bahre) and needs some serious repair, so that would take a year or two. But when it is better, give it one of New Hampshire's dates for payback. 49. Bronco posted: 11.26.2008 - 2:32 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I think the current length of the schedule is fine, it's just that the length of the races and some tracks are an issue. Pocono should only have one date, and it should be 400 miles. The racing at California Speedway sucks and has no place on the schedule, certainly not in the Cha$e. Atlanta should stay in the fall and Darlington should return. And for God's sakes, add some more road courses, at least one to the Cha$e as a replacement for Texas. A true champion of the sport should be good everywhere, not just short tracks and 1.5 mile tracks. But we all know none of this will ever happen. The only upcoming change to the schedule will be Kansas getting a second date at the expense of Martinsville. 50. Dodge posted: 11.26.2008 - 8:57 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) DaleSrFanForever As I said I would love to see North Wilkesboro back but not at the expense of New Hampshire. I live in New England and there has never been a race at New Hampshire that wasn't sold out. They draw more than any other sporting event in New England. 51. Anonymous posted: 11.26.2008 - 10:06 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) If Nascar really wanted save the teams money, they should've cut down the amount of banking at Daytona and Talladega. It would be a good start. I know for a fact races teams spend a lot of money on place racing in terms trying to get extra speed in the retricted engines and hire a group of people just to R &D on plate racing. Dei was one of the first teams to spend a lot of money and focus on plate racing. It was the case from 2001 to 2004. Place racing causes the "big one" to happen. There a lot of teams that needed to make or a repair a race car after a plate race. Repairing a race car takes time and money to fix. I know people wreck at short tracks, but usually there are not wrecks that involve 12 to 22 cars in the same wreck. If those two tracks didn't have plates, cup teams wouldn't have to build at least 3 cars a cup season for plate racing or repair a cup car for plate racing 3 times in a year at their shop. It could happen if driver gets caught in the big one 3 times. The 2nd thing to cut costs to limit the amount of cars a race team can make a year like a cup team is allowed to make 6 cup cars in a year or in the team's stable at one time unless a cup car is destoryed. 52. Anonymous posted: 11.26.2008 - 10:49 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) There should be some changes in the race schedule in cup. Texas and Calfornia hasn't sold out both of dates since they got 2 racing dates in seasons. Calfornia's attendance has been a problem since 2006 for both races. Because of the attendance issues of the tracks, a date should be taken a way and it should be their fall date. Atlanta and Charlotte had problems selling out both dates for several years. I recalled the all star race being half full either in 2006 or 2007. a race date needs to go away for both the tracks. Daytona International Speedway has a road course besides being a 2.5 oval race track. The 2nd Daytona date should be used the road course as a result with it being a 400 mile race. I don't know pocono still has two dates. I have a problem with a track getting 2 races date in just over a month time. There is 2 solutions for that. 1.) get a rid of the date. 2.) move the 2nd date from August to September. Darlington needs to be back to Labor day weekend. Rockingham, North Wilkesboro, Nashville, Gateway International Raceway to the race schedule. I think North Wilkseboro would have to add some seats beside the track needing to be repaired. I the race track could handle 50,000 to 60,000 seats. I would move the race date of the first Phoenix race to after the Calfornia date. I would move the Texas date to after the Los Vegas date. I would move the sonoma race to where the 2nd Texas race is right now. Phoenix and Texas needed to be moved due to the fact weather could because weather has been an issue in march in the past. Bristol a couple years ago was an example of it since it snowed in March 2006. That part of the schedule. Nasville and Gateway are not cookie cutter tracks. Those two tracks would bring a challenge to cup teams. Sadly what I want wouldn't happen. Nascars problems could be fix once they get rid of all the people in charge of Nascar right now including France. 53. Steve posted: 11.27.2008 - 1:18 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) That's something thing I forgot; the exhibition races. The All-Star race has been boring on recent years (anybody recall any exciting finishes to the race since Jr pressured Newman in 2002?), and the Bud Shootout is now officially a joke, because winning the pole is no longer important to NA$CAR. Another money-saving idea is a "Run What Ya Brung" policy. Loosen up the criteria for the cars: A. the body (length, width, height, wheelbase, etc.) MUST match that of the street car it portrays. B. the car MUST weigh 3400 pounds or more (I would reduce that to 3000) C. engine size cannot exceed 350cc; no power limits D. fuel storage system has no size limit (whether it's 15 gallons or 30 to 40 gallons), but IT MUST BE SAFE AND PASS AN IMPACT TEST E. sufficient roll cage If the teams' cars meet these criteria, then Boogity, boogity, boogity!!! Go racin', boys!!! Even though I don't follow NA$CAR so closely these days, it really boils down to my hatred of what has happened to a sport I adored. I can watch a race from 2000 or 2001 (when I started following NASCAR) and then watch a current NA$CAR race and it feels completely different. I agree about the road courses, Bronco. 4 or 5 would be great! They're cool because they're different for the drivers. 54. Dodge posted: 11.27.2008 - 2:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) No, lets not add any more road courses unless you are going to ban the Road Ringers unless they are gonna run SOME ovals. It is wrong for these drivers because they are knocking the regulars out of their rides. 55. Canadianfan posted: 11.27.2008 - 3:44 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Here is how I would like see it. Bud Shootout bring back the pole part it is meaningless without it and shorten it to 40 laps two 20 lap heat races and invert the field like the old days. 1.Daytona 500 stays the same 2.Auto Club 500k instead of miles 3.Shelby 427 interesting idea keep it 4.Kobalt Tools 500 same 5.Subway Fit Fresh 500 replaces Bristol 6.Goodyâ??s Fast Relief 500 same 7.Samsung 500 same 8.Food City 500 new date a bit warmer 9.Aaron's 499 same 10.Crown Royal 400 same 11.Rockingham 500 replaces Darlington Sprint Showdown shorten to 20 laps Sprint All-Star Race race shorten to 70 laps 20/40/10 and invert field after every heat 12.Coca-Cola 600 same 13.Best Buy 400 same 14.Pocono 500k instead of miles 15.Lifelock 400 same 16.Toyota/Save Mart 350 same 17.Lenox Industrial Tools 301 same 18.Coke Zero 400 same 19.Lifelock 400 same 20.Allstate 400 same 21.Meijer 400 Presented By Oreo Kentucky replaces second Pocono date 22.Centurion Boats at The Glen same 23.North Wilkesboro 400 replaces second Michigan date 24.Sharpie 500 same 25.Mountain Dew Southern 500 replaces second California date 26.Chevy Monte Carlo 400 same 27.Bank of America 500 replaces second New Hampshire date 28.Checker Auto Parts 500 replaces second Dover date 29.Kansas 400 same 30.TUMS Bring It On 500 replaces second Talladega date 31.Pep Boys Auto 500 replaces second Charlotte date 32.A Third Road Course date suggestions needed 33.Dickies 500 replaces second Atlanta date 34.AMP Energy 500 replaces second Texas date 35.Rockingham 400 replaces second Phoenix date 36.Ford 400 same So here is my schedule I would love to know what you all think or what the third road course should be. 56. DaleSrFanForever posted: 11.28.2008 - 3:45 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) You're right Dodge, New Hampshire deserves two dates, but only because of the fans. It holds 101,000 people and sells out twice a year no matter what. Those fans deserve it. That is a good schedule Canadianfan, but I have just one suggestion. Switch the spring Bristol and Martinsville dates on your schedule. The Bristol fans show up no matter what. In 2006 it snowed all weekend and they still packed it. At Martinsville this spring it was 35 degrees and it had a lot of empty seats. Back when that date was in the middle of April it filled up easily, even the backstretch seats. North Wilkesboro could easily expand their seating to almost 90,000. There were never any seats between turns 3 and 4. Plus the backstretch seating could be vastly expanded. This might sound like heresy, but I wouldn't be opposed to switching the frontstretch and backstretch like they did at Darlington. They can't really expand frontstretch seating because there is a big hill right behind it, so they could do like they did at Darlington. They would have to bulldoze the infield anyways and rebuild everything, so they could redo the pits too. God I hope somebody can buy that place and get ANYTHING racing there again. I'll be there even if it is old women racing scooters. 57. Anonymous posted: 11.29.2008 - 9:28 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Updated thanks for the comment DaleSrFanForever Here is how I would like see it. Bud Shootout bring back the pole part it is meaningless without it and shorten it to 40 laps two 20 lap heat races and invert the field like the old days. 1.Daytona 500 stays the same 2.Auto Club 500k instead of miles 3.Shelby 427 interesting idea keep it 4.Kobalt Tools 500 same 5.Subway Fit Fresh 500 replaces Bristol 6.Food City 500 as requested by DaleSrFanForever 7.Samsung 500 same 8.Goodyâ??s Fast Relief 500 as requested by DaleSrFanForever 9.Aaron's 499 same 10.Crown Royal 400 same 11.Rockingham 500 replaces Darlington Sprint Showdown shorten to 20 laps Sprint All-Star Race race shorten to 70 laps 20/40/10 and invert field after every heat 12.Coca-Cola 600 same 13.Best Buy 400 same 14.Pocono 500k instead of miles 15.Lifelock 400 same 16.Toyota/Save Mart 350 same 17.Lenox Industrial Tools 301 same 18.Coke Zero 400 same 19.Lifelock 400 same 20.Allstate 400 same 21.Meijer 400 Presented By Oreo Kentucky replaces second Pocono date 22.Centurion Boats at The Glen same 23.North Wilkesboro 400 replaces second Michigan date 24.Sharpie 500 same 25.Mountain Dew Southern 500 replaces second California date 26.Chevy Monte Carlo 400 same 27.Bank of America 500 replaces second New Hampshire date 28.Checker Auto Parts 500 replaces second Dover date 29.Kansas 400 same 30.TUMS Bring It On 500 replaces second Talladega date 31.Pep Boys Auto 500 replaces second Charlotte date 32.A Third Road Course date suggestions needed 33.Dickies 500 replaces second Atlanta date 34.AMP Energy 500 replaces second Texas date 35.Rockingham 400 replaces second Phoenix date 36.Ford 400 same So here is my schedule I would love to know what you all think or what the third road course should be. 58. Kit posted: 11.29.2008 - 8:22 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) We just need to cut the schedule back down to 30 races a year and go back to the regular points system. With each race being 1/30 of the overall picture rather than 1/36, each race is more critical for the championship. 59. Dodge posted: 11.30.2008 - 6:40 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Kit, I respectfully disagree. Leave the schedule at 36 or maybe even add another one race. Weekend really aren't the same without racing. On Saturdays I feel like I could kind of go and hibernate like a bear. Sunday's not much better either except for the local NFL team. 60. Kit posted: 11.30.2008 - 4:38 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) No, NASCAR has went downhill since they have added more races. Each individual race means less to the overall championships now. Hell, with the chase system, how you do in the first 26 doesn't really matter as long as you are in the top 12. Even with the traditional points system, it would be a whole lot harder to see close championships with so many races. I'd prefer to see something like the truck series, with 29 to 30 races a year, tighter point battles, and possibly even shorter races. 61. Reno posted: 11.30.2008 - 10:05 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) If I designed the schedule, I'd go to as many different tracks as possible, instead of going to so many tracks twice (14 of them, in fact) as they do currently. Daytona, Darlington, and the short tracks would each get two dates, but everyone else gets only one. That would open up spots for places like Nashville, Kentucky, Gateway, Iowa, Irwindale, Montreal, O'Reilly RP, and of course, Rockingham and Wilksboro. The schedule should be based on quality of racing, not on "reaching new markets." Oh wait, Brian France is running the show, so never mind. 62. Red posted: 11.30.2008 - 10:09 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) While we're talking shedule, does anyone else think the All-Star race has become a total waste of time? All of Nascar's stars share the same track every week, so why do we need this gimmicky bullshit on the schedule at all? 63. DaleSrFanForever posted: 12.01.2008 - 1:01 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Excellent post Red. I agree 100% 64. richiesbx137 posted: 12.01.2008 - 4:03 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I agree with some of your comments, one they should keep the races at 36 races a season. If I made changes take out a california race, (because one they do not fill the stands, secondly the first race conflicts the oscars, which is also in LA and it should be one race). Also, Darlington, should have a second race in labor day weekend. Here how I would made, remember I am doing this by track, not by name of race. Also I should Iowa and Kentucky in the schedule 1. Daytona 2. Las Vegas or Phoenix 3. Phoenix or Las Vegas 4. Atlanta 5. Bristol (Day) (fans will go regardless) 6. Texas 7. Martinsville 8. Talladega 9. Richmond 10. Kentucky 11. Darlington 12. California *. All-Star Race- Charlotte-Lowe's 13. Charlotte-Lowe's 14. Dover 15. Pocono 16. Michigan 17. New Hampshire 18. Daytona 19. Chicagoland 20. Indianapolis 21. Watkins Glen 22. Michigan 23. Bristol (Night) 24. Iowa 25. Darlington 26. Richmond 27. New Hampshire 28. Dover 29. Charlotte-Lowe's 30. Kansas 31. Sonoma 32. Martinsville 33. Talladega 34. Texas 35. Phoenix 36. Homestead-Miami 65. Steve posted: 12.03.2008 - 2:01 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) This is my idea of the 30-race Cup schedule. Notable differences include some shorter distances (some long-distance races restored), several new or classic venues added, one race for each venue, Memorial Day weekend off (IndyCars don't race in Feburary during Daytona Speedweeks, so let's repay the favor; maybe Stewart, Montoya, and Hornish would try the Indy 500 again) and no Brickyard 400 (I think the event has lost its luster and the tire situation in 2008 may be a sign of things to come at IMS w/the CoT). February: Daytona 500 & Milwaukee 225 March: Iowa 300, Texas 500, & Gateway 300 April: Memphis 300, Pikes Peak 300, & Irwindale 300 May: California 500 & Sonoma 150M June: Du Quoin 200 (a dirt track!), 150-200MI @ a random road/street course, Father's Day Michigan 400 July: Homestead 500K, New Hampshire 225, Pocono 400, Talladega 500 August: IRP 300, Watkins Glen 200, Kentucky 300, Bristol 500 September: Darlington Southern 500, Richmond 400, Dover 500, Martinsville 500 October: Winchester 400, Charlotte 500, Rockingham 500 November: Phoenix 300, NAPA 500 @ Atlanta. Perhaps not perfect, but WDYT? 66. Dodge posted: 12.03.2008 - 4:54 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Steve, it sucks. Some tracks do deserve to lose a date (or two (California). Others like NHMS that sell out every single race deserve 2 dates. NHMS may not be the most exciting racing but its a diferent type of racing. My opinion on people that are saying that NASCAR needs to shorten the schedule are that those are not the Diehard NASCAR fans. Just my OPINION. Also, Steve the reason why Indycars don't start their season in February is that since most of them are foriegn, they can't handle racing 10 months or every week. It's dumb that they start in late March and over by mid September. Plus a whole month of May only 1 race but a hell of a lot of practice. I do watch Indycars if NASCAR isn't on. The only forms of racing I never watch is anything Motorcyle, Drag, Boat and Rally racing. 67. Steve posted: 12.04.2008 - 2:02 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) "the reason why Indycars don't start their season in February is that since most of them are foriegn, they can't handle racing 10 months or every week." WTF?! How is that related to anything? Also, regarding NHMS, why race there twice? Once is enough to have a good presence in the Northeast (to accompany Dover, Pocono, and Watkins Glen). Does it "suck" because it's not what your idea would be? 68. Dodge posted: 12.04.2008 - 10:00 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Steve, NHMS has sold out every flipping event. Even the last few years when the seats at most other tracks are selling less.NE loves NASCAR, we embrace it unlike Californians who just don't show up at the races.Sure some tracks don't need 2 races like Michigan, Pocono, Texas and Phoenix. California Speedway don't deserve any cup dates. Kentucky is just another Kansas style track. Also, I believe that Pikes Peak may not be there anymore. Plus, I don't agree with the road course belongs in the chase crap because you get TOO MANY ROAD RINGERS ENTERING. If NASCAR changes the rule saying that if you are a ROAD RINGER, YOU MUST RUN A COUPLE OF OVALS ALSO, then I would consider changing my position. Lastly, I enjoy Memorial Day weekend when you have the trucks and Nationwide on Saturday and then the Indy 500 and the Coca-Cola 600. I watch all 4 of those races. To say that NASCAR should stop racing on Memorial Day would be 2 things 1) Dumb and 2) since the MILITARY MEMBERS LOVE NASCAR, IT WOUULD SHOW THEM MORE DISRESPECT. 69. Anonymous posted: 12.04.2008 - 1:21 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Once is enough to have a good presence in the Northeast (to accompany Dover, Pocono, and Watkins Glen). Then why does Kentucky need a date? Kansas, Indy, Chicago and Michigan are all close. 70. Anonymous posted: 12.04.2008 - 4:58 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Steve, A race date for the Milwaukee mile for cup date would be great, but your schedule date for the Milwaukee 225 is dumb idea. I live not too far from the Milwaukee mile for for a very long time. Milwaukee 225 shouldn't be February for a couple reasons: 1.) Milwaukee 225 at the Milwaukee Mile in February would be facing major weather issues like snow and the temperatures would be anywhere from 10 degrees to 45 degrees. It isn't 45 degrees a lot in February. Milwaukee Mile most of the time gets 40 to 70 inches of snow in a winter. Snow storms are capable of happening anytime from Nevember to early april each year. 2.) The track doesn't do auto racing in February due to the winters in Wisconsin. The track doesn't have auto racing from november to the end april. 3.) Goodyear never has made snow tires on race cars before and Goodyear doesn't have the best record of making good race tires lately. 71. Bronco posted: 12.04.2008 - 11:47 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Since they're never going to change the schedule the way we'd like, I decided to make a list of my top 10 predictions for the 2009 season listed by car number. I thought it would be neat to look back and see how accurate I was. 1. Car #20 - The future driver of the #20 will not live up to all the media hype and will not win a race or ROTY. The ban on testing won't work in his favor either. 2. Car #77 - Hornish will either lose his ride during the season, or at the end of the season, or he will leave nascar. In any case I don't see him being in Cup during the 2010 season. This is more of a hope than a prediction, I want to see someone worthy like Allmendinger take over the #77 car. 3. Car #14/39 - Both Stewart and Newman will not win a race or make the Cha$e next year. I don't see what is essentially a startup team doing that. Plus Newman doesn't even have full sponsorship. 4. Car #47 - Ambrose will win a road course race next year. He ran in the top 5 all day at Sonoma and then got wrecked, and he could have possibly won Watkins Glen if he hadn't started 43rd. He is definitely one of the top road racers in nascar, no question. 5. Car #55 - NAPA will move its sponsorship to Reutimann after the 2009 season. I can't believe how the best driver that MWR has is the one missing a half season of sponsorship. 6. Car #6/26 - McMurray and Ragan will both make the cha$e and will win at least one race each. McMurray finished the 2008 season very strong plus he's getting his old crew chief back. 7. Car #07/33 - Bowyer will not make the cha$e or win a race, and same with Mears. Bowyer barely made it this year. 8. Car #88 - Dale Jr. will win at least one superspeedway race. This is more of a hope than anything else, I`d love to see him win Talladega again. Since 2004 he`s had awful luck there. 9. Car #5 - Martin will a race or two and make the cha$e, but will not win the championship. His best shot at winning it was back in the 90`s not now. 10. Car #2 - Busch will become a free agent and will have a new ride for 2010. A guy with his talent shouldn`t have to drive the crap that he`s been getting. 72. Anonymous posted: 12.05.2008 - 1:36 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Logano will win ROTY in 2009. His only competition will be Scott Speed since Ambrose and Almirola did over 7 races 73. Ambrose_fan posted: 12.05.2008 - 11:10 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Something that I don't think has been mentioned that would really spice things up: Street circuits. 74. DaleSrFanForever posted: 12.06.2008 - 12:18 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Silly Season 2009 predictions: Martin Truex is named Joe Gibbs Racing's 4th driver for 2010 bringing Bass Pro Shops along as the sponsor. Jamie McMurray goes back to struggling and and is announced as out of the #26 ride at the end of the season, to be replaced by David Reutimann who will once again far outperform his teammates at MWR. Brad Kesolowski is announced as Mark Martin's successor. Casey Mears does like he always does, runs mediocre and gets outperformed by all of his teammates, leading to him being announced out at season's end, to be replaced by Bobby Labonte. Kurt Busch leaves Penske Racing for another mediocre team, like Earnhardt Ganassi or GEM. His career choices haven't been wise. Other predictions: -The law of averages finally catches up to JJ and the 48 team as they are caught up in 3 wrecks not of their own doing in the Chase. -Carl Edwards wins less races but is more consistant leading to a championship in both Cup and Nationwide. -Kevin Harvick gets in a scuffle and a war of words with someone (I'm really going out on a limb on this one!!!) -The new California October date still has a lot of empty seats (and this one!!) -Jeff Burton only wins one race but gets a whole lot of Top 15 finishes, gets in the Chase, makes a little noise early, then disappears (I'm on a roll) -Without Joe Gibbs, Tony Stewart totally explodes making his sponsors unhappy leading to him having a very quiet 2nd half on and off the track. -Neither Stewart nor Newman make the Chase, win a race, lead many laps, or really contend for any wins. -Logano struggles but wins ROY by default. Both Stewart and the #20 team secretly wish they were still together. -Marcos Ambrose contends for wins on the road courses but struggles mightily on the ovals. -Jack Roush scowls a lot (do I have balls or what!!!) -Dale Jr's season looks a lot like this one, but his fans won't care. -Clint Bowyer and his old #07 team never get in synch with their new driver/team leading to much tension within the RCR camp. -NAPA signs a ten year extension with Michael Waltrip who is still floundering. -Short fields after Daytona or lots of start and parks, which isn't necessarily a bad thing, especially at the smaller tracks. 75. Dodge posted: 12.06.2008 - 1:27 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) DaleSrFanForever Reutimann will not be going to RoushFenway Racing UNLESS Nascar gets rid of the 4 team cap that begins in 2010 76. Anonymous posted: 12.06.2008 - 6:37 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) 2009 silly season predications Kurt busch will be leaving Penske for Red Bull Racing. Casey Mears will be gone after 1 year at rcr. The 26 team will be gone From Roush and will be part of Yates Racing. The Wood Brothers will fold. Truex will be going to Stewart Haas or RCR. Vickers will be going to Earnhardt Ganassi. Attendance will be going down and ISC and IMS will be force to lower their prices on food and tickets. More cup teams will by gone by 2010 and teams will be losing sponsors. One of the big 3 will be pulling out of Nascar. Hint: It is not ford or chevy. Other 2009 predication: Atlanta or Charlotte will lose a race date in 2010 to Kentucky. Hendrick Motorsports- Johnson will not win his 4th Chase, Dale Jr will win 2 races next year and finish in the top 10 in points, Mark will win a 2 or 3 races in the 5 car and Jeff Gordon will will finish in the top 10 in points. RCR- Mears will be lucky if he finishes in the top 20 in points. Harvick will win a race and will get in a in a scuffle with Montaya. Clint will by on the bubble for making it to the chase. Burton will make it to the chase and will fade. Gem with petty- If the meager with petty happens, A.J will be finishing top 20 in points in the 10 car. Reed will be getting 3 to 6 top tens in the 43 car. Kasey will be on the bubble for making in the case with a win or 2. Sadler will get his normal 6 to 12 top 5's a year. Yates racing-Menard will be finishing in the top 20 or 25 range in points. Kvapil will be ending up the same in points. Roush- Edwards will be the winner of the chase with a total 8 wins. Kennseth will be be on the bouble for making it to the chase. Biffle will make it in the chase and will have at least 1 win. Reagan will get his first win and should make it in the chase. Jamie McMurray will not make it in the chase, but should finish with 13 top 10's. Marcos Ambrose will be winning a race, but will struggle a lot during the season. Stewart Haas- Ryan and Tony shouldn't make it the chase. They might contend for a couple wins this season with the being on short tracks and road course. Gibbs racing- The 20 team will be missing Stewart a lot. Joey might finish in the top 25 at best. Lack of testing is going to him big time. Hamlin will get a win and has a good chance make the chase. Kyle Bush will make the chase and will be better in the chase. Penske- will contend for a win once in a while, but will be struggling a lot with Kurt and David Stremme. Sam Hornish, Jr. should be done before the end of season. Schrader or Nemecheck will be taking over the 77 car for the remainder of the year. Red Bull Racing- Vickers will finish in the top 20. The 84 team will be hurting with speed behind the wheel. Speed might finish in the top 30 if he is lucky. Robby Gorden Motorsports- This might be Robby's last year as an owner driver. He might contend as Road course and plate tracks only. Bill Davis will be gone by the end of the year. Earnhardt Gannassi- If Gem is buying Petty, Bobby will be in the 41. Bobby will have 5 to 10 top 10's in the car. Truex- will get 11 to 14 top 10's this years before leaving the organization. Montoya will admit to wrecking Harvick on Purpose and he will be in a scuffle with Harvick. Almirola will get anywhere from 2 to 8 top 10's. Michael Waltrip Racing- Michael will be finishing in the top 30 in points. He will get a top 10 once in a while. David Reutimann will be getting 8 to 10 top's this year with a top 5. 77. DaleSrFanForever posted: 12.07.2008 - 5:23 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) You're right Dodge, let me rephrase that: David Reutimann will be going to "Yates" Racing. Although I do have another prediction: The whole "Roush must cut down to four teams" mandate gets ugly. As in "court injunction" ugly. 78. Dodge posted: 12.08.2008 - 7:38 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) DaleSrFanForever Whho would Reut replace? They will probably get the 26 car. I hope that it would be Gilliland out for Reutimann if that is the case. 79. DaleSrFanForever posted: 12.09.2008 - 4:22 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Most likely Gilliland, in my opinion. He hasn't really improved in his time in Cup, either in speed or avoiding mistakes. I know sponsorship issues hurt them this year, but he still found himself in a lot of wrecks, plus Travis Kvapil really outperformed him. And I really think the Juan Pablo incident will hurt him. As much as others have probably daydreamed about doing that, it is something you just can't do, at least not in that manner. And I imagine the #26 will probably be the team to go. We know Jack won't get rid of the #6, and the #16, #17, and #99 are really tied to their current drivers right now. The #26 has kind of a rocky history, even with the championship. Jack bought the #97 John Deere team and ran mediocre with Chad Little. They put Kurt Busch in and ran really well, with many wins and a championship. But it was one of the most unpopular teams ever. Once Kurt fussed his way out of Roush and into Penske (what a smart move!) they even changed the number just to get as far from Kurt as possible. I just have a feeling that team is the furthest from Jack's heart. Hell, he's even letting Jamie hand pick his crew chiefs! Remember, Jeff Gordon may have ended up with Roush, but he wouldn't let Ray Evernham come along (bet he regrets that) because he wanted to pick the crew chief. 80. Bronco posted: 12.11.2008 - 10:30 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) It's sad to know that a lot of drivers and teams that were in this race will likely not be there for the 2009 Daytona 500. Guys like Allmendinger, Riggs, Blaney, Raines, Nemechek, McCumbee and Smith have their future up in the year for 2009. Others like Elliott will run a very limited schedule. Almirola's year depends on sponsorship. Schrader will also run a few races here and there, but I see Hall of Shame Racing shutting down soon. Labonte is also out of the 43 but he'll likely be going to the #41. We're either going to have smaller fields, or a lot of field fillers like a few years ago but either way it's going to be interesting to see what happens. 81. DaleSrFanForever posted: 12.13.2008 - 12:10 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "Car #88 - Dale Jr. will win at least one superspeedway race. This is more of a hope than anything else, I`d love to see him win Talladega again. Since 2004 he`s had awful luck there." I don't know if it is so much awful luck as it was DEI falling back to Earth on the plate tracks (and falling off the face of the Earth everywhere else). From 2001 to 2004, both Dale Jr and Michael Waltrip were both branded as "great drafters" as they always dominated the plate events. But it is awfully funny that ever since 2005, both have not run up front nearly as much and haven't hardly been in contention for wins at plate tracks. Could it be that is was just the equipment was FAR and above everything else on the track at the time? Did they just forget how to draft? "Atlanta or Charlotte will lose a race date in 2010 to Kentucky." I wouldn't be opposed to Kentucky taking Charlotte's fall date, and I only live about an hour from Concord. I haven't been to a race there in a few years because it just isn't worth it because the racing is so bad. Why sit in traffic forever and walk halfway across town just to watch a bad race with an overpriced ticket? I don't mind the traffic and walking at Martinsville because the racing is great and the prices are reasonable. Let's see if Kentucky can put on a decent show. 82. Steve posted: 01.03.2009 - 3:46 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I'll add some of MY predictions to the mix: 1-Martin Truex Jr: Guess who's back? For a win? He will win a race and contend for a spot in the chase. I don't know if he'll get in, but he will still have a shot in September. JPM may challenge him for team supremacy, but Truex will most likely be the leader at the new EGR team. 5-Mark Martin: Mark is hungry. He's back full time. He will win, and he will make the chase (all 3 times he's tried, he gotten in). And I agree with a previous comment about Keselowski replacing him in 2010 or 2011. 6-David Ragan: First-time winner. He'll "break his duck" and again fight for a chase spot. 7-Robby Gordon: Feast or famine. He and the team will finally make progress and crack the Top 20 in points or he will fall from the Top 35. 07-Casey Mears: Moving up. He will fight for a chase spot. 12-David Stremme: A sleeper. I think he will surprise a lot of people at Penske. 14-Tony Stewart: Daytona 500 winner. Bold, I know, but I have a hunch. 18-Kyle Busch: Saving it for the end. His start to 2009 will not be as strong as in 2008, but he will be a bit more stealthy at the end of the year. 20-Joey Logano (R): Give him time. Don't hit the panic button just yet; in the second half of the year he will be much improved. 24-Jeff Gordon: All or nothing. He will either win a race and make the chase or fail to do both. 29-Kevin Harvick: Sneaky Pete. Kevin will be a darkhorse for the Cup. 33-Clint Bowyer: Dancing with the devil. Clint will either grab the final spot in the field or fail to qualify for one of the first 5 races until 2009 points take effect. 42-Juan Pablo Montoya: Coming full circle. Juan will get closer to emulating his oval track performances he showed in CART a decade ago. 43-Reed Sorenson: An enigma. Not sure what wasn't right for him at Ganassi, but I don't think things will be any better for Speedy Reed at Gillett. 48-Jimmie Johnson: Four Score. Jimmie and Chad will be somewhat of a threat in the first 20 races before they come on like Gangbusters and fight until the end at Homestead. 82-Scott Speed (R): Onr rung at a time. Speed showed improvement at Homestead (started 2nd and finished 16th) and will find the Top 10. If he gets things sorted out quickly, he may be a winner. 83-Brian Vickers: No Bull. He will continue to be the leader at Team Red Bull, and he will have a chance at victory and making the chase. 88-Dale Earnhardt Jr.: Git 'Er Done! I feel that 2009 will be Jr's best chance to win the Cup. I'm not saying he WILL do it, but team chemistry will be better with a season under their belt. RIP Petty Enterprises. 1949-2008. 83. Dodge posted: 01.03.2009 - 8:52 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Steve, you sure have guts, lol. Mears fighting for a chase spot. Speed possibly contending for wins. 84. Kit posted: 01.03.2009 - 11:28 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Steve, those are not predictions, those are simply wishful thinking on your part. "07-Casey Mears: Moving up. He will fight for a chase spot." You mean just like he fought for a chase spot in the #5 car, which was equal or better than the RCR he's going to now? Hahaha. "12-David Stremme: A sleeper. I think he will surprise a lot of people at Penske." Penske is a second-tier team going through down years. Stremme won't be able to do much. "14-Tony Stewart: Daytona 500 winner. Bold, I know, but I have a hunch." "42-Juan Pablo Montoya: Coming full circle. Juan will get closer to emulating his oval track performances he showed in CART a decade ago." He'll continue to wreck and get into confrontations with other drivers. No you don't, just more wishful thinking. The team he is going to fielded the #66 and #70 teams. He might be bringing new people and some money but it's going to take a hell of a lot more time for them to get competitive. Plus Tony really does not have the temperament to be an owner/driver. He damages his own car way too much when retaliating against other drivers. You can't do that when you field your own stuff. More than likely he won't win a race next season. A lot of your "predictions" conflict each other. 85. Steve posted: 01.04.2009 - 12:21 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I see no conflicts (except your disagreement). Interesting that you choose to critique MY predictions and nobody else's. Regarding Stewart, Sterling Marlin once said after the Big One (in frustration after dominating again), "You can take a junk car and run good here. There's nuthin' to it!" Even if the car isn't up to his liking (it probably won't be), Stewart knows the draft as well as anybody and can make up a significant difference. About Montoya: I said he "will get closer" to his CART oval racecraft. On several occasions JPM was in the Top 10 or Top 5 before an accident (usually not his fault, like with Gilliland at Texas), and I think he will be in the Top 10 more often in 2009. At least those ideas aren't far-fetched like Truex going to Stewart-Haas in 2010, Ambrose winning, or the unnecessary attacks on Sam Hornish Jr's ability. 86. Willy on Wheels posted: 01.04.2009 - 7:23 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Stewart Racing will contend for wins soon after the 2009 season begins. If Johnny Sauter, Scott Riggs and Jeff Green could pull off an occasional top ten in the 66/70 cars, then Tony Stewart and Ryan Newman will have no problem contending for wins. 87. petty43 posted: 01.05.2009 - 3:30 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) its a sad day that i knew was coming but i must admit that petty enterprises has been left in the cold. they tried so hard but i am hearing that all employees are be cleared out. i hope that those guys and all others who lost a job in racing find work soon best wishes to them. I have not been less interested in nascar that i am now EVER!!!!!! they could be headed for a indy racing like demise. 88. Kit posted: 01.05.2009 - 11:25 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) [quote]Johnny Sauter, Scott Riggs and Jeff Green could pull off an occasional top ten in the 66/70 cars, then Tony Stewart and Ryan Newman will have no problem contending for wins. [/quote] There is more to winning than just who is in the driver's seat. I know you've only been watching NASCAR for about a year or so, Willy, but you'll find this out eventually. 89. Kit posted: 01.05.2009 - 11:29 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "Interesting that you choose to critique MY predictions and nobody else's." Because I don't have time to read all 80+ responses to this race and your response was the newest one. The key word is "run good there." Marlin had very good cars when he won the '94 and '95 Daytona 500s. Who cares about Montoya? 90. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.06.2009 - 12:34 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Ironic. In the same winter both Richard Petty's team and Dale Earnhardt's team go belly up and are forced to "merge". I hope this is the the worst it will get for NASCAR, but it probably won't be. Even if the economy does improve (unlikely) NASCAR has made it harder and harder to get excited about this sport. Between huge disparities between the haves and have-nots, absolutely crappy racing, bad personalities, and bad racetracks, it doesn't look good for the sport I have followed closely since I was 5 years old. I am really sad to see Petty Enterprises be absorbed. Yeah the #43 will be out there, but we know it won't be Richard's. Worse, it will have the underwhelming Reed Sorenson behind the wheel. I have the utmost respect for the Petty family and what they have done for the sport and I hoped they would be involved forever. And seeing DEI go under was really bad for me. To think about all that time Dale spent planning it and building it and how much pride he took in it when it succeeded, and to think of the condition it is in now is heartbreaking. Yes, I know Dale has been gone for almost 7 years. And yes, I know it in no way resembles the company he left behind in February 2001. But I will always think of it as Dale's company, even though it has been run into the ground by horrible management decisions. To see it end so ingloriously, with Ganassi literally picking the scraps up off the floor, is sad. 91. Willy on Wheels posted: 01.07.2009 - 12:36 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "There is more to winning than just who is in the driver's seat. I know you've only been watching NASCAR for about a year or so, Willy, but you'll find this out eventually. Kit | 01.05.09 - 11:25 pm " FYI I have been watching NASCAR since 1994. And Stewart Haas Racing has more than just Tony and Ryan, They have higher paying sponsors, like Old Spice and Office Depot, hired better crew chiefs and mechanics, and will probably get more support from Chevy than the 66/70 did. 92. Anonymous posted: 01.07.2009 - 5:41 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Steve, Ambrose winning a race isn't really far fetched. Ambrose is capable of winning on Road Courses. Ambrose carried the Wood Brothers to a 3rd place finish at Watkins Glen even. Ambrose has a great history at Road Courses in the Nationwide series also. Ambrose is one of the top drivers at road courses in cup by what he did last year in the races. He did well at Sonoma before transmission problems. 93. Kit posted: 01.08.2009 - 1:28 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "FYI I have been watching NASCAR since 1994." The type of comments you make would suggest otherwise. "And Stewart Haas Racing has more than just Tony and Ryan, They have higher paying sponsors, like Old Spice and Office Depot, hired better crew chiefs and mechanics, and will probably get more support from Chevy than the 66/70 did." That's true but it's not what you said originally. I was replying to what you said originally. But it still takes more than what you just posted to be really competitive; you still need team chemistry. 94. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.13.2009 - 10:57 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Bobby Labonte will drive for Hall of Fame Racing in 2009, which has ditched its only redeeming factor -JGR technical support- for support from Yates Racing. So they are a satellite team of a satellite team. I like Bobby and I respect his driving talent and classiness, but his career moves have been head scratching. Next year he will drive for Furniture Row Racing with technical support from Kirk Shelmerdine's team. 95. Bronco posted: 01.14.2009 - 8:25 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "Bobby Labonte will drive for Hall of Fame Racing in 2009, which has ditched its only redeeming factor -JGR technical support- for support from Yates Racing" Haha redeeming factor? If anything that was their dooming factor. Think about it - it makes no sense that the 96 sucked last year no matter who was driving it while the 11,18,20 were competitive each week. They were obviously not getting any "technical support". There was a sports illustrated article about JJ Yeley where he talked about that. As far as Bobby is concerned, I don't see any change in performance. It's good to know he found a ride, but he's still going to end up 20-25th in points with a top ten here and there. I agree his career moves have been weird - I will never understand why he didn't sign on for the 33 Cheerios Chevy for next year. The real winner in this is Hall of Shame racing for securing a sponsor and being locked into the first 5 races. 96. Dodge posted: 01.15.2009 - 9:48 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Not exactly is Bobby locked in. If he and Tony needs a championship provisional, Tony gets it before Bobby. 97. Kyle_Petty_Not_busch posted: 01.15.2009 - 4:38 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Yates has finally found a way back into Victory Lane!!!!!! 98. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.15.2009 - 8:48 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I agree JGR's technical support has been weak, but it is better than getting support from a team that is already a satellite team. And you have to take what JJ Yeley says with a grain of salt. He is the same guy who said that he wasn't given a fair shake in the #18 car, that it wasn't as good as the other JGR cars. Kyle Busch got in that car this year and won EIGHT times with the same crew and crew chief. It is time for JJ Yeley to quit making excuses and admit that he is a terrible stock car driver. And the other drivers who drove the #96 last year weren't very good either. Joey Logano was in WAY over his head, he actually did worse in a 4th JGR car. And Ken Schrader, God bless him, was mediocre in his prime. And he is WAY past his prime. Let me make this clear: I know the #96 wasn't an elite ride by any means, but with those drivers, I'm surprised they did as well as they did. I do agree he should have taken the #33 car. Then RCR could have kept Bowyer in the #07 car with his old team like he should have and not had to hire the crappy Casey Mears. 99. Kit posted: 01.16.2009 - 12:16 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Bronco has a point. JGR yanked Logano out of the HOF car because his finishes were so bad. Obviously they weren't providing HOF with much help. I kind of suspect that Labonte considers himself to be past the prime of his career (who knows why) and doesn't really pursue competitive cars anymore. He's keeping himself out of good rides. 100. Kit posted: 01.17.2009 - 5:00 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) MY PREDICTION FOR THE 2009 SEASON: It will be worse than 2008 due to there being a limited number of competitive teams due to the economy among other things. Right now, we have more competitive drivers than teams. Guys like Kahne, Kvapil, Newman, Reutimann, et cetera should be winning a lot more races than they are, but they can't because their equipment isn't up to snuff. Due to so many sponsors pulling out, there will be a larger disparity between the have and the have-not teams. The teams already strong will survive and the rest of the teams will have a hard time catching up. 101. Dodge posted: 01.17.2009 - 9:55 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I personally think that David Reutimann is not as good of a driver in the Cup Series as others make him out to be. Sure, he did good in the trucks and Nationwide series. There is a reason why he never got a chance earlier in NASCAR. Nowadays, its real unusual to have a driver that is 37 years old as a rookie like Reutimann was. 102. Bronco posted: 01.17.2009 - 11:10 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Dodge, In only his second season in Cup David finished 22nd in points and ran up front a lot while driving for what can at best be described as a Tier 3 team. You don't think that's good? I'm not sure why you bring up age. Age has nothing to do with driving ability, if you can drive, you can drive at any age. Even in 2007 Reutimann impressed me by qualifying for more races than his veteran teammates without any champion's provisional or anything, and he was the highest finishing MWR car points wise. If he was with a good team, he would be in the Chase easily. 103. Dodge posted: 01.18.2009 - 9:05 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) My only reason why I brought his age up was that if others thought he had a lot of POTENTIAL he would of been in Cup A LONG TIME AGO. 104. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.18.2009 - 1:28 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) I think the world of David Reutimann. To run as respectably as he did last year for such a terrible team is incredible. You also have to consider that his teammates are also terrible so they cannot offer him anything. All Michael McDowell could give him advice on is how to create spectacular wrecks and how to wreck in any given situation. And Michael Waltrip, well, I've given my opinion of him many times. He has nothing to offer advice wise. Plus I don't think DJ was much help. It was pretty obvious that at the end he was already thinking ahead to his post driving career. That fire that used to drive him was gone. As for the age thing, he just wasn't coddled from infancy to be a race car driver. His Dad didn't move his family to Charlotte like Joey Logano's Dad or to Indianapolis like Jeff Gordon's Dad to be in the middle of it. Plus he has a very shy personality which scared sponsors away. That is why the Nemco deal fell apart in 2003. Otherwise he probably would have broken through then. 105. Kit posted: 01.19.2009 - 1:57 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Not quite, Dodge. A long time ago, rookie drivers did not get the best rides. Besides, no offense, but Reutimann didn't really have anything to do with the point I was trying to make about the teams. 106. Anonymous posted: 01.19.2009 - 7:30 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Dodge, one of the reasons Reutimann got a late state in Nascar was the fact he began his career racing dirt-track modifieds. If he started racing at the age 18, Nascar owners were not looking at Dirt Track drivers in Busch or Cup level back in 1988 or 1989. Drivers mostly came from ASA, Arca, late model, modifies or a different stock car promotion before going to Nascar. Tim Richmond and Ken Schrader were the expection with coming froma sprint car series or CART. Ken Schrader didn't get his start from racing in dirt despite the fact he raced in different types of racing since. Dale Earnhardt Sr. raced dirt for a short time in his career before switched to asphalt if I read correctly 7 or 8 years ago. If Dale didn't do that, he wouldn't have been in Nascar. Nascar stopped racing dirt in the early 1970's. That proved Reutimann didn't lack the talent. David Reutimann decided to follow the path of his dad as a dirt track racer. The 2nd thing is David Reutimann basically didn't race anything outside of dirt track Modifies or late model racing till he was 27 years old. The 3rd thing is David Reutimann didn't alway raced full time. He even worked at UPS briefly. It means one out of 3 reasons. 1.) He might have had a problem getting sponsors before Nascar. See DaleSrFanForever's statement on why. 2.)David Reutimann might have been hurting for money at some point during his racing career. It could've been partly caused the first reason. All the statements I mentioned shown his late start was caused by circumstances outside racing on the track. 107. Dodge posted: 01.20.2009 - 9:12 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Ok, I didn't know that HE ran dirt mods. I thought he ran he NASCAR Weekly races. Then that does explain hy he was an older rookie than the rookies of he last few years, minus the guys that ran in indycars. I still don't think he will EVER make a chase or come close because I don't think he is one of the top 5 newer drivers. Truex, Hamlin, Ky. Busch, Kahne and Bowyer, in no particular order. 108. Kit posted: 01.20.2009 - 10:15 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Dodge, drivers have on and off years. An "off" year for one of the guys you mentioned can easily become an "on" year for Reutimann. I can easily see Reutimann making the chase with Hamlin missing out. 109. Dodge posted: 01.21.2009 - 9:30 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I know that drivers have good and bad years. There are other drivers that are older that I think have a better chance at getting in the chase. Heck, Mark may end up in the Chase. Stremme may even sneak in with Penske if they've been working extremely hard to get better. Plus, the DODGE car got a newer nose that will help on the intermediate tracks so right there that hampers Reutimann's chances because I believe that Richard Petty Motorsports are going to have a good year, minus Reed Sorenson. I know I've been knocking Ragan but I believe now that David Ragan even has potential to get in the Chase. 110. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.21.2009 - 12:19 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Of the RPM crowd, Kasey is probably the only possible Chase candidate. I would feel better about the #19 car if Allmendinger were in there. If he could stay steady like he did at the end of 2008 and keep improving speed wise he could make a run at it. But even if he runs the full schedule (which looks unlikely) it will be in a 4th team which probably won't be up to speed. So we can thank Elliott for that. I still can't believe he sued to STAY IN THE CAR!!! They made it clear that they don't want you. If you want to sue for a buy out bonus, that is fine, but don't force those crew members into this situation. Again, I'm not saying Gillette is a saint, he should have never signed him to an extention and he should have released him earlier so he can try to get a ride. But Elliott has put undue distractions on RPM this year. And yeah, forget about Reed. That was another horrible manangement decision. Hopefully in the future Robbie Loomis can prevent this crap from happening again. But I like the way they kept Richard Petty around and named it after him. That was a classy thing to do. Now if they can get some decent drivers to compliment Kasey and AJ. Hopefully they'll be able to force Elliott and Reed out by the end of the year and get some talented drivers instead. 111. Bronco posted: 01.21.2009 - 10:56 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "I still can't believe he sued to STAY IN THE CAR!!!" Why can't you believe that? If he had sued for the money owed to him, he could take that and walk away but then his NASCAR career would be over just like that. Once you lose your ride, it's hard to get another one and eventually you're out of sight and out of mind. By staying in the car he gets a chance to prove himself to other teams and pick up a different ride for 2010. "But Elliott has put undue distractions on RPM this year." How? If the GEM/RPM idiots hadn't screwed around with the contract none of this would have happened. Elliott simply fought for his rights, if any of us were in that position we would no doubt do the same. I can't believe they named the team RPM. I don't get how the guy who's being bought out gets to call the shots. To call the team RPM is just weird, half the cars aren't even the King's and one has the dreaded alcohol sponsorship. In any case I don't see this new team doing any better than before. 112. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.22.2009 - 5:15 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "Why can't you believe that? If he had sued for the money owed to him, he could take that and walk away but then his NASCAR career would be over just like that." It should be over. He has had many seasons to impress and hasn't. He's had some good moments and appeared to be on the path to superstardom in 2004, but that was followed by more mediocrity. He's had his chance, time to step aside and let someone else give it a try. He's entering Michael Waltrip territory, finding ways to stay in the car that don't include getting any better as a driver. Becoming a TV personality instead of a good driver. "How? If the GEM/RPM idiots hadn't screwed around with the contract none of this would have happened." I was talking about the crew members that build and work on the cars. I've admitted that the Gillette brass isn't very bright. But the guys who put in the back breaking work will have to do so for a driver that had to file a lawsuit to stay in the car. If he would have just stepped aside, recognized his mediocrity, and let AJ take over, they could just focus on racing. Now everything they do will get second guessed. 113. Dodge posted: 01.22.2009 - 6:54 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) Its funny, you know. The Yates TEAMS struggled in the second half of 2004 and are still. Elliott drove for the Woods and struggled. He goes to Yates who were getting ready for a downward spiral and took over the 19 car from "The Squeal." It sounds like he has NOTHING he can do. You can't really do anything when you aren't getting the good stuff. I think Elliott is a better driver than his results show. Another reason why Elliott Sadler and Michael Waltrip has lasted so long in Cup is that they always get EVERY sponsor plugged by being on TV so much. I personally would rather see Michael or Elliott on TV than some jerk like Jimmy Spencer. The reason why GEM (now RPM) has struggled is that they had some idiot engineer that they hired and he changed everything. They fire him and they are slowly getting back to form. It takes time and in this sport, you just don't have time on your side. When Spencer drove, I liked him but now that I've seen him with a microphone and hear him STILL take shots still at Kurt Busch shows how pathetic he is. 114. Kit posted: 01.22.2009 - 9:06 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) "Stremme may even sneak in with Penske if they've been working extremely hard to get better." Stremme hasn't even done very much in Busch for as much as he has raced. Newman left Penske because they are not competitive enough to win many races, much less chances. "But Elliott has put undue distractions on RPM this year." They did that to themselves by releasing Sadler so late in the season. That wasn't very professional of them at all. If they wanted to move in another direction, they should have done it earlier. I agree about renaming themselves RPM as being classy. At least a Richard Petty organization (even if in name only) will win races with Kahne. "By staying in the car he gets a chance to prove himself to other teams and pick up a different ride for 2010." That's true in theory, but realistically, what else does Sadler have to prove? Granted, his rides haven't been stellar, but Mayfield did do quite a bit in it and the team hasn't went that far downhill in the past couple of years. "He's entering Michael Waltrip territory, finding ways to stay in the car that don't include getting any better as a driver. Becoming a TV personality instead of a good driver." I agree, hell, I think I mentioned this first on this site. I like Sadler, but what I don't like is when we see more of him with a microphone rather than being interviewed for a top five finish. 115. petty43 posted: 01.22.2009 - 11:33 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) ok time to blow off the old press guides and warm up for another exciting year of cup racing. well since everyone is in the prediction mode here goes, expect a whole lot more of the same, 2009 will mirror 2008 expect the same drivers in the chase save for tony who will get replaced by mark martin or kahne or kurt busch, these other drivers who are expected to break through like reutimann and ragan will not because talent only takes a driver so far. but experienced teams are the key now, jimmie johnson WILL 4 peat you heard it here 1 22 2009. he is a virtual lock apart from really bad luck. the 99 will slide back as will most of roush while hendrick teams flourish with the big dollars suport that only rick can offer, this recession favors him over all these other owners right now. chevy will win manufactures cup this year, logano roy by default, and junior will remain most popular. this is his teltale year, now we will see if he is privelged by last name or if he has real talent, he should definately win 3 or 4 races this years in those cars no excuses! look for biffle to replace edwards as lead driver in roush camp and rcr cars will win more races while gibbs slides downward from what i hear, also the penske cars are anticipating a big revival but with what talent??? the big surprise could be the new dei ganassi team which combines strenghts that both teams needed. o and here is hoping that this is last year of mikey and i really hope that hylton does not make a race, that would be like pete rose or ric flair trying a comeback please just go away and accept that nascar will be just fine without a 74 year old driver who was washed up 35 years ago. 116. Dodge posted: 01.23.2009 - 4:30 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I personally would love to see James Hylton in the race. I also hope that Johnson doesn't win the Cup this year, he is due for a horrible year. 117. DaleSrFanForever posted: 01.24.2009 - 12:27 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) The fact is that Kasey has outperformed Elliott from the second he arrived at GEM. Not only that, but Dinger outran him big time in the five races he ran in the same cars, and AJ has only driven stock cars for two years. I just see Elliott as having a relatively low upside. For an organization trying to break through to the top tier, you can't do that with stiffs like Elliott. Can you do that with AJ? I don't know, but at least there is a possibility, wheras there is none with Elliott. They have a franchise cornerstone in Kasey, now they need to give him competent teammates. "I agree, hell, I think I mentioned this first on this site." You did. I meant to mention that. 118. Kit posted: 01.24.2009 - 5:45 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I agree EXCEPT they are not going to make it to the top tier if they keep up with the unethical behavior like canning Sadler in late December/early January. That's the kind of behavior you'd expect from Bill Davis and Ganassi, not a top tier organization. If they felt that Sadler was not the guy, they should have acted sooner. 119. reffy posted: 03.08.2009 - 5:54 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) If NASCAR gave only points to those who finished first and second, (win = 2, second = 1) than this would be the Top 10 for 2008 Johnson and Busch would need to win at Homestead and keep Edwards out of second place to tie him for 21, where the championship would be decided by wins, than second place finishes, than thirds, etc. Edwards - 23 Johnsonn - 19 Kyle Busch - 19 Biffle - 6 Stewart - 6 Kahne - 6 Burton - 4 Earnhardt - 4 Kurt Busch - 4 Bowyer - 3 120. 18fan posted: 03.10.2009 - 1:01 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) This was Montoya's last race in a Dodge, which might help him be more consistent, and Gordon's last race with the Red and Blue flame car. His new black car looks really good. My dad is a huge Gordon fan. 121. jp posted: 04.14.2009 - 8:50 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) The races should be like this: Bud Shootout Gatorade Duels 1.Daytona 2.Phoenix 3.California 4.Texas(Day) 5.Talladega (off-Weekend) 6.Richmond 7.Bristol(Day) 8.New Hampshire(Day) 9.Michegan 10.Darlington(Day) 11.Infineon 12.Rockingham(Night) 13.Dover 14.Iowa(Day) (off-weekend) 15.Martinsville(Day) 16.Circuit Gilles Villenueve 17.Phoenix 18.Daytona(Night) Sprint Open Sprint All-Star Challenge 19.Lowe's 20.New Hampshire(Night) 21.Watkins Glen 22.Texas(Night) 23.Iowa(Night) 24.Dover 25.Richmond 26.Martinsville(Night) 27.Milwalkee 28.Talladega(Night) 29.Gateway 30.Mexico 31.Lowe's 32.Bristol(Day 2) 33.Atlanta 34.Michegan 35.Homestead 36.Las Vegas NASCAR Banquet held at MGM Casino 122. SoxFan24 posted: 10.25.2009 - 1:55 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) So Jp you are taking away the night race at Bristol. Moving Michigan to November???? I dont' agree with either one. Bristol at night although it isnt' what it once was is still a great race. Michigan is going to be cold in November dude 123. SoxFan24 posted: 10.25.2009 - 2:06 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Okay after that...the milestones of this race Last win for Carl Edwards as of 10/25/09 Last top 5 for Jamie McMurray as of 10/25/09 Last race for Clint Bowyer in the Jack Daniels car. Last top 10 for Travis Kvapil in the Cup series as of 10/25/09 Last top 10 for Yates as of 10/25/09 Last race for Casey Mears driving for Rick Hendrick Last race for the 10 car in Cup racing as of 10/25/09 Last race for Tony Stewart driving for Joe Gibbs Last race for Haas/CNC racing as we know it Last race for UPS with Michael Waltrip racing. Last race for Ryan Newman driving for Penske racing Last race any Cell Phone Companies other than Sprint can sponsor a car in the Cup Series as of 10/25/09 Last cup race for Bill Davis racing a team that won a Daytona 500 and had been in the cup series since 1993. In fact it was the last race with Bill Davis as a car owner in any series period Last race AAA sponsored a Jack Roush Car Last race for DEI as we knew it Last race for Petty Enterprises as we knew it Last race for US Army as a sponsor for DEI. US Army sponsored the 01 car before it was bought by DEI Last race for Chad McCumbee as of 10/25/09 Last race for AT&T as a primary sponsor in the Cup Series Last race for Alltel period as they are now a part of Verizon Last race for Bobby Labonte driving for Petty Enterprises. Last race for Paul Menard driving for DEI Last race for David Gilliland driving for Yates Last race for Reed Sorenson driving for Ganassi 124. luigistarted06 posted: 11.22.2009 - 1:45 pm Rate this comment: (1) (0) This is the one season that it really would have been much more exciting had the chase not been. I mean imagine, 5 laps to go. Edwards has a narrow 16 point lead in the championship. Gas is running low, if he holds on he'll win the race and championship. If the gas runs dry and he has to pit, he loses everything in a split second. Wow, a fuel milage championship. Now that would have been something 125. ii posted: 09.29.2010 - 6:51 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) People please look at my comment for this '06 race. 126. JJSucks posted: 03.16.2011 - 5:53 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) MOST BORING SEASON EVER!!!! 127. Cooper posted: 05.05.2011 - 2:40 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) 2009 Final Standings by Driver Rating --Driver rating essentially takes all luck out of the equation and depicts who were the best drivers in each race. I sorted every race of the chase by driver rating and assigned the points accordingly to where they finished in driver rating. 1. Jimmie Johnson 6676 2. Carl Edwards -21 3. Greg Biffle -225 4. Jeff Gordon -262 5. Matt Kenseth -270 6. Kevin Harvick -287 7. Clint Bowyer -318 8. Jeff Burton -331 9. Dale Earnhardt Jr. -338 10. Denny Hamlin -339 11. Kyle Busch -363 12. Tony Stewart -384 Kyle Busch's collapse wasn't from bad luck, he just ran poorly all the way through. Carl Edwards was really good and was very close to Jimmie's performance. Talladega killed him in real points. Everyone from basically 3rd on back ran around each other all chase long. 128. Cooper posted: 05.06.2011 - 11:09 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) *2008 Final Standings by Driver Rating 129. Brian posted: 05.31.2011 - 9:50 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Under the old system, (which really rewards the best driver) Carl Edwards would've won! Gah...damn Johnson 130. Matthew Sullivan posted: 04.08.2012 - 1:28 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) A top 10 finish in the race and the points standings is taken away from Junior in the final laps when his right front wheel bearing fails. Had Junior finished where he was running, 10th, he would have scored enough points to finish eighth in the standings. 131. Daniel posted: 05.22.2012 - 11:36 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) In using fastest 43: #13 Max Papis, #77 Sam Hornish Jr., #96 Ken Schrader Out using fastest 43: #8 Aric Almirola, #47 Marcos Ambrose, #55 Michael Waltrip 132. kup posted: 05.24.2012 - 1:05 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) UPS - Universal Points System - after all races of 2008 Cup Points for a driver = His Distance /devided/ His Average Finish Dis/AvFn = Driver = KM-Miles / AV-FN 1499 Carl Edwards 14244 / 9,5 1371 Jimmie Johnson 14392 / 10,5 1146 Kevin Harvick 14214 / 12,4 1141 Jeff Burton 14257 / 12,5 1116 Kyle Busch 13946 / 12,5 133. Anthony posted: 10.26.2012 - 5:54 am Rate this comment: (1) (0) Would Kyle have won the Cup if there was no Chase? He had a huge lead after Richmond and the last 10 races would have played out a lot differently because there would be none of this "momentum" crap that is associated with the Chase. I think he would have Kensethed his way to it (ie. breeze through) 134. CBASS posted: 01.28.2013 - 7:34 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Sponsor updates #31 AT&T #01 Dale Earnhardt Inc./ Principal #41 Target/ Polaroid #28 All Sport Body Quencher/ Big Red #43 Liberty/ Garmin #21 Ford-Motorcraft #96 DLP HDTV/ CompUSA.com #20 Home Depot "Thanks Smoke" #70 Haas Automation 25th Anniversary http://archives.ciastockphoto.com/cgi/images.php?group=w0840 http://www.motorsport.com/nascar-cup/photos/main-gallery/?s=5&y=2008&r=2944 135. Ed posted: 10.10.2013 - 12:00 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) First time in Chase history that the 10 races are swept by Chasers 136. Big Mac Fan posted: 01.11.2016 - 11:20 pm Rate this comment: (0) (2) Busch's chase collapse in 2008 seems very identical to the Dallas Maverick's 2007 season, where they went 67-15 and then lost in the first round. 137. 18fan posted: 01.12.2016 - 3:17 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) I would say the 18 team as a whole collapsed, not just Kyle, but this one got thrown in with the later Chases when he did play a big part in the collapse. They had mechanical problems in the first 3 chase races and they weren't one of the 3 or 4 fastest cars during the Chase anyways. The 99 car was the fastest all season long and during the Chase the Roush cars were all really good, plus the 48 team really turned it on. Even without those mechanical problems I don't think Kyle would've challenged Carl and Jimmie because they were faster at that point in the season. Where I would place the blame (as a career-long Kyle Busch fan) for Kyle's Chase shortcomings: 2006: Him. Put himself in a deep hole less than 5 laps into the Chase and, after some decent races, hit the wall at Martinsville and spun on lap 2 at Atlanta, but it was over by that point. Didn't have the speed to make for a mistake and the New Hampshire disaster was self-inflicted. 2007: There was no shortcoming. Kyle was a lame-duck playing 3rd fiddle to Johnson and Gordon. Had a really good Chase that was undone by wrecks at Kansas and Talladega and pit stop trouble at Atlanta and Texas (probably should've won both of those races and won neither) 2008: Mechanical failures. 3 straight bad finishes due to mechanical failures are impossible to overcome and then a melted bead at Martinsville blew any chances of a decent points finish (you can argue that a melted bead is driver error, but it was already over at that point). 2009: Him. Small things throughout the regular season were killers. Both Daytona races stand out as missed opportunities. (Contrary to what he said at the time, the wreck at the end of the 400 with Tony Stewart was a racing deal. I don't agree with people that say he should've just let Tony go by him without trying to defend the lead). 2010: Him. While I believe David Reutimann took a cheap shot, putting someone with nothing to lose in a position where they can cost you is dumb, especially how early in the race the initial contact was (there was also the Bristol press conference remark as well). The Texas bird-flipping incident is the defining image, but any championship chances were long gone by then. 2011: The big one here is the Ron Hornaday incident and I have to say that might be one of the dumbest, most blatant things I've ever seen and he probably should've been parked for the rest of the season and he was lucky to keep his ride. But it was bad luck that took him out of championship contention, being caught up in wrecks at Talladega and Martinsville. Halfway through the Chase he was 7 points ahead of Tony Stewart. 2012: Combination of driver and bad luck. There were several mechanical failures and several crashes, both of his doing and not his doing. I do not fault him at all for losing Watkins Glen. Yes he came across Brad's nose, but how many drivers are just going to cede position racing for the lead on the final lap. And what gets overlooked from that race is the spanking he put on Brad and Marcos Ambrose on the last run before the track became full of oil. Richmond was just bad because Dave Rogers made a terrible pit call but Kyle folded as soon as he realized that it wasn't working. I thought Dave Rogers was going to be let go as Kyle's crew chief the next day and he made it all the way through the 2014 season. Him missing the Chase stung much more when he was the only driver who could challenge Jimmie and Brad for most of the Chase. 2013: Lack of speed and Kansas. Kansas might have been his worst race ever. They missed the set-up at Martinsville and he sped at Texas, but other than that they were pretty much a 5th place car most of the Chase and he finished 4th in points. 2014: For 8 races this was one of his better Chases. Started out with 5 top 10s in a row, not flashy but doing what he had to do, including a great recovery with a heavily damaged car to finish 8th at Loudon and getting his first top 5 ever at Kansas. Then the Talladega wreck happened, which was brutal and not his fault. Could've finished much higher in points after another incredible comeback at Texas to finish 4th, but crashed at Phoenix and had a mechanical failure at Homestead. Was not championship caliber, but could easily have finished higher than 10th in points. 2015: He again just did what he had to do to advance (barely in the first two rounds), and then let the competition take themselves out to get to Homestead. In some ways there was a swap between Kyle and Matt Kenseth in that Kyle just posted solid result after solid result and saved his best race for last while Matt got in a big feud and lost his head completely. Scored top 5s in all three races of the third round and then drove the best race of his career to win the title at Homestead. Had 6 top 5s in the last 8 races, including 3 of the elimination races (counting Homestead). 138. 88&4Fan posted: 02.07.2016 - 3:50 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) This would be the last time that Sterling Marlin finished a race. He ran seven races in 2009 but S&Ped or had legitimate problems in all of them. 139. kup posted: 11.16.2017 - 2:30 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) UPS: universal points system. Driver's UPoints = Miles / Aver.Finish 2008 UPS _ Driver = Miles / AF 1499 Carl Edwards 14244 / 9.5 1371 Jimmie Johnson 14392 / 10.5 & TOTAL: UPS! 60 years 1949-2008: Dale Earnhardt 8 in: '80, '86, '87, '89, '91, '93, '94, '95. Richard Petty 7 in: '63, '64, '67, '71, '72, '75, '79. Lee Petty 5 in: '50, '52, '54, '58, '59. David Pearson 4 in: '66, '68, '69, '76. Jeff Gordon 4 in: '98, '01, '04, '07. - every 3rd year Cale Yarborough 3 in: '74, '77, '78. Bobby Allison 3 in: '81, '82, '83. Mark Martin 3 in: '90, '97, '02. Buck Baker 2 in: '56, '57. Rex White 2 in: '60, '61. Terry Labonte 2 in: '84, '96. Bill Blair 1 in: '49. Fonty Flock 1 in: '51. Herb Thomas 1 in: '53. Tim Flock 1 in: '55. Joe Weatherly 1 in: '62. Ned Jarrett 1 in: '65. Bobby Isaac 1 in: '70. Benny Parsons 1 in: '73. Darrell Waltrip 1 in: '85. Bill Elliott 1 in: '88. Alan Kulwicki 1 in: '92. Dale Jarrett 1 in: '99. Bobby Labonte 1 in: '00. Matt Kenseth 1 in: '03. Tony Stewart 1 in: '05. Jimmie Johnson 1 in: '06. Carl Edwards 1 in: '08. 140. RaceFanX posted: 01.12.2018 - 9:20 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Chip Ganassi Racing and Dale Earnhardt, Inc. announced just days before this race their teams would be merging together to form a new team named Earnhardt Ganassi Racing with Felix Sabates. Juan Pablo Montoya leads two laps and finishes in the top-20 as Chip Ganassi Racing runs its last race with Dodge cars before switching to Chevrolets, like DEI ran in 2009. Reed Sorenson qualified in the top-10 in the last race for the Target #41 Dodge, a team that had been around since 2002 with that sponsor/number combination, but finished well back; the team disbanded for 2009 with the Target sponsorship moving over to Montoya's surviving #42 squad. 141. Kellen posted: 04.20.2018 - 7:57 pm Rate this comment: (0) (1) Last race for the #8 in the Cup Series until RCR brings the number back to life for rookie Daniel Hemric at the April Richmond race in 2018. 142. Stephen posted: 04.20.2018 - 8:01 pm Rate this comment: (1) (0) ^Easy to forget, but the 8 ran the first 7 races of 2009 before folding. 143. BMan0213 posted: 04.20.2018 - 8:01 pm Rate this comment: (1) (0) Actually it's not. EGR ran the 8 for Aric in the first 7 races in 2009 until they had to shut the team down due to lack of sponsorship. Not 100% but it looks like the first Texas race in 2009 was the last race for the 8 in the Cup series until this weekend 144. JSPorts posted: 04.20.2018 - 9:04 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Yes, that is correct. Almirola had a dismal first 7 races for EGR that season, with an average finish of 32.9 in the first 7 races. He was 37th in points when the team folded. 145. Wot posted: 04.20.2018 - 9:58 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Nope, the last race was Texas in 2009 146. Minnowfur posted: 05.11.2018 - 9:54 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) My top 10 favourite races in 2008 1.New Hampshire first one 2.Talladega chase race 3.New Hampshire chase race 4.Bristol first one 5.Richmond second one 6.Bristol Night race 7.Martinsville first one 8.Pheonix chase race 9.Lowes chase race 10.Richmond first one 147. NascarLeadLapPoints posted: 07.03.2019 - 2:08 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Free Passes Caution 1: #10-Allmendinger Caution 2: #21-Elliott Caution 3: #9-Kahne Caution 4: #16-Biffle Caution 5: #66-Riggs Caution 6: #28-Kvapil Caution 7: #12-Newman 148. Chase9Fan posted: 08.09.2019 - 9:54 am Rate this comment: (0) (0) Going back reading old races. This race marked the first season since Gordon's rookie season that he did not win a race. 149. SweetRich posted: 07.06.2020 - 8:53 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) The last race for long-time car owner Bill Davis. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Post a comment:* Your comment may not appear immediately - all comments must be approved by the moderator. Name: Comment: