|| *Comments on the 2021 Verizon 200 at the Brickyard:* View the most recent comment <#9> | Post a comment <#post> 1. QFH posted: 08.15.2021 - 5:08 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) That has to be the most WTF finish I've EVER seen. Curb causing two HUGE crashes, guy gets penalized on the restart then just straight up takes out the leader and puts a part-time underdog in Victory Lane. Absolutely shocked 2. QFH posted: 08.15.2021 - 5:16 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) And Justin Haley puts Spire Motorsports in the top 10 too. (And this time it wasn't a rainout race win after Kurt Busch botched pit strategy...) 3. Mile501 posted: 08.15.2021 - 9:13 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) A.J. Allmendinger just accomplished something that hasn't been done outside of Daytona in more than 35 years--win a race with a part-time team. Only Trevor Bayne (2011 Daytona 500) has won with a part-time team since 1985. A handful of part-time drivers have won since then, but they did so while driving for full-time teams (such as Haley in 2019, Vickers in 2013, and Keselowski in 2009). There was also Tim Richmond, who won twice in 1987 while his team ended up running part-time, but only because of his health issues. But a true part-time team winning on a non-restrictor plate track? It used to be commonplace, but it hasn't happened at all in the last 3 1/2 decades. 4. QFH posted: 08.16.2021 - 8:06 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) I just saw someone else say this... Allmendinger's two career wins have both been the first win for the two respective race teams (JTG and Kaulig) 5. Danish_Pie posted: 08.17.2021 - 7:41 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Can someone explain how Briscoe was parked, but is the second highest finishing car to have completed 94 laps. Shouldn't he theoretically be either the first car one lap down or the last car one lap down? 6. Mile501 posted: 08.18.2021 - 12:55 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) Allmendinger's win is also the first-ever win for an unchartered team since the charter rule began in Cup. #5 - That's a very good question, but with the comment section here as it is now, I don't know if we'll ever find an answer. You're right, though. In my opinion, Briscoe should really be placed 24th, the first car to complete 94 laps (because he completed 94 laps before the rest of the cars 1 lap down did). 7. Bob posted: 08.18.2021 - 10:23 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) @4 and @5 Briscoe and Custer were both in lead lap (Hill and Smithley were a lap down), my guess is that they scored Briscoe as the last driver to start the last lap (and did not finish) because of his penalty so theoretically he was supposed to be behind Custer...or Custer stopped his car on the track ahead of Briscoe did or something like that...but then another question comes in: Custer was on the leader's lap but didn't complete the last lap, so why did they put him as running at the finish? 8. Mile501 posted: 08.19.2021 - 2:58 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) @7 - I know that question has come up before. Apparently, in recent years, NASCAR quietly and inexplicably began a policy where a driver is listed as "running" if they are running as they cross the line at the white flag, even if they don't complete the last lap. I didn't realize Custer didn't complete the last lap, though. If so, he should be listed at 94 laps complete, but that would at least make the finishing order itself correct. 9. Bob posted: 08.25.2021 - 3:01 pm Rate this comment: (0) (0) @8 Yes, you're right, I've seen a few cases where this didn't happen, but in the vast majority (like 99%) they put it as 'running'. Yeah, I only noticed because I was following the live leaderboard on the last lap and realized that the custer didn't complete the last lap..It's already listed as 94 laps completed, so it kind of corrected itself...but it's a curious and weird case ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *Post a comment:* Your comment may not appear immediately - all comments must be approved by the moderator. Name: Comment: